Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3331252

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

to change windows from the current material - wooden frames, to uPVC frames.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for changing windows from wooden frames to uPVC frames at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/02093/HH, dated 3 September 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be the carried out in accordance with the submitted product design specifications by Bluemanor Windows Ltd, photographs, Location Plan and Block Plan.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is whether the proposed works would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the [site address] Conservation Area (the Conservation Area), a designated heritage asset, and their effect on its significance.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The Conservation Area’s defining characteristics include the predominantly Georgian buildings and a few late 20th Century infill dwellings. Its character and appearance are mainly derived from older buildings along the road frontages where traditional windows and architectural detailing are widely evident. The appeal site is within ‘The Courtyard’ which is set back behind the frontage of [site address] from where there are limited views of the development.

    The design of The Courtyard is sympathetic to and broadly reflects the character of the area. It comprises a modern group of four properties and garages which was granted planning permission in 1998. As the Council accepts, the development does not contribute to the historic significance of the Conservation Area. The distinctiveness of The Courtyard lies with its layout of perimeter buildings around a hardstanding and its set back location behind the [site address] buildings. The houses are timber clad, except for No 4 which has a brick external finish. The group has a uniform appearance in terms of its form, height and massing and windows design. There is no Article 4 direction relating to The Courtyard.

    It is proposed to replace the timber windows at No 1 with uPVC windows. The window openings would be unchanged and the existing glazing pattern would be copied. The appeal property already has a uPVC conservatory at the rear and a side elevation window with uPVC window bars. The use of uPVC in the conservatory was considered acceptable because the rear of the property could not be seen from the street. As observed at my site visit, none of the property is visible from [site address] , due to the set back of the development from the street and the location of No 1 at its end. The Council states that the proposal would introduce uPVC windows into the Conservation Area. However, it has also been used at the neighbouring No 4 and in the four houses in the adjacent courtyard development ‘[address]’.

    In my judgement, timber windows are not essential to the significance of the appeal property because its significance is not derived from the building’s historic construction and materials. Within the context set out above, the proposed windows would not affect the character or appearance of No [site address] as a whole, nor undermine its original design intent. As the windows would be part of a modern building set behind the street frontage buildings, they would have a neutral effect on the Conservation Area, preserving its character, appearance and significance.

    I conclude that the proposal complies with the aims of Braintree District Local Plan Policies SP7, LPP36, LPP47, LPP52 and LPP53 which in summary, collectively and of relevance to this appeal, require that the design and materials of alterations should be compatible with the original dwelling and character of the area and are sensitive to the need to conserve and enhance local features of architectural and historic importance, particularly within Conservation Areas. There would be no conflict with the conservation objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.

    In accordance with the statutory duty, I have paid special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Conservation Area. For the reasons set out above and having regard to all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.

  4. Section 05

    Condition

    A condition is necessary which identifies the approved specifications, photographs and plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 322No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    18 March 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    24 February 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3331252
Application reference
23/02093/HH
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Braintree District Council
Planning authority code
E07000067

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
12 October 2023
Valid date
12 October 2023
Start date
8 January 2024
Planning authority decision date
12 October 2023
Appeal decision date
18 March 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
48388
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21