Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3331946

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

landscaping to the side and front of the house, involving levelling the garden, increasing the height at the edges (furthest from the house) by more than 300mm, building a retaining wall, rebuilding the steps leading to the front door of the house and moving the off street parking from the side to the front of the house.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for landscaping to the side and front of the house, involving levelling the garden, increasing the height at the edges (furthest from the house) by more than 300mm, building a retaining wall, rebuilding the steps leading to the front door of the house and moving the off street parking from the side to the front of the house at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2023/00115/FULH, dated 12 January 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted relates to the following approved plans: 00757621-A0CFB5; 011222/3 [name]; 011222/1 [name]; and 011222/2 [name].

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Works have been carried out to this property to relocate the parking space and alter the previously sloping lawn to the side and front garden. This has involved the use of brick retaining walls to manage the level changes. Although the appearance of the surrounds of the house are currently quite stark, this would be significantly changed once landscape planting has been undertaken. The walls that adjoin the footpath are not overly high and although they present a more formal appearance than previously, the works are not out of keeping. The www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate Appeal Decision: APP/M0655/D/23/3331946 use of brick walling is not uncommon in this area and the terraced sections will allow for better landscape management. The council has a preference for the previous low retaining wall and sloping lawns. However, this revised arrangement also represents a good standard of design that would not result in harm to the character or appearance of the area and would offer opportunities for enhanced landscaping.

    The reason for refusal refers to the design elements of policies CS1 and QE7 of the Warrington Local Plan Core Strategy 2014. This has now been replaced by the Warrington Local Plan 2021/22 - 2038/39 which was adopted in December

    Policy DC6(1)(a&b) seeks development that respects, sustains and makes a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness; and contributes positively to the public realm. I do not find conflict with these design objectives. The works do not conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 as this development is likely to function well and has the potential to add to the overall quality of the area.

    The raised height of the wall is not considered by the council to be a safety issue with regard to vehicle movements and given the nature of this road, I agree with this assessment. Any safety concerns with regard to the use of this area would be a matter for the appellant to resolve as part of the wider management and use of the garden. [name] have had regard to the views put forward by the council and third parties, I am not satisfied that there are any matters that weigh significantly against the proposal. I therefore allow the appeal.

    As the works have already taken place, a commencement condition is not necessary. I have included a condition making reference to the details of the approved plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 341No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    4 January 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    12 December 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3331946
Application reference
2023/00115/FULH
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Warrington Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000007

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
0 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
No
Historic building grant made
No
Relates to a conservation area
No
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
No

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
25 October 2023
Valid date
25 October 2023
Start date
8 November 2023
Planning authority decision date
15 August 2023
Appeal decision date
4 January 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
44381
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21