Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3332788

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

9 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a rear first floor conservatory structure extension to provide additional living space.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a rear first floor conservatory structure extension to provide additional living space at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/2018M, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    At the time of my site visit the rear first floor conservatory had already been constructed. Whilst permission is therefore sought retrospectively, the appeal development also proposes some amendments to its design, which I shall return to below. I have proceeded accordingly.

    The Government published on 19 December 2023 a revised version of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). Whilst this made certain revisions to aspects of national planning policy, the provisions in respect of the main issues in this case are largely unchanged. I am therefore satisfied that there is no requirement to seek further submissions on the revised Framework from the parties, and that no party would be disadvantaged by such a course of action.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The effect of the development on the living conditions of occupiers at 7 Grangeway, with particular regard to outlook.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a two-storey, detached dwelling located in a predominantly residential area. The adjacent property, No 7, is within very close proximity to the appeal dwelling, with both properties having limited space to the shared side boundary.

    There is an existing side window on the first floor of No 7 which faces the appeal dwelling. The evidence before me indicates that this is the sole window serving a bedroom and was installed following a first floor extension to the rear of No 7.

    The introduction of this window in a position directly facing and within close proximity to the side elevation of the main part of the appeal property is an unusual arrangement. Occupants of No 7 would have a poor outlook from this room which is predominantly of the original side elevation of the appeal property. Only a very oblique line of site towards the space now occupied by the first floor conservatory would have previously been provided.

    The appeal development would extend the first floor side elevation of No 5 through the introduction of boarding which reflects the external wall finish of the original property. The non-transparent side elevation would further restrict outlook from the side window of No 7 through the erosion of the already limited line of sight. Nevertheless, it would not create any greater overbearing sense of enclosure to the bedroom than that which already exists. The outlook would remain very poor, similar to that which occupiers currently experience.

    Accordingly, the proposal would not result in additional harm to the living conditions of occupiers at 7 Grangeway and thus it accords with Policies SE1, HOU12 and HOU13 of the Cheshire East Site Allocations and Development Policies Document (December 2022). Together with paragraph 135 of the Framework, these policies aim to protect the living conditions of existing occupiers.

  5. Section 06

    [name]

    I note the concerns raised by an interested party regarding the design of the development and privacy. All rear facing windows would be replaced with obscure glazing and I shall condition this to be at the level required so as to prevent overlooking.

    Whilst some views of the development may be possible from neighbouring properties and from public vantage points beyond to the rear, I share the Council’s view that the design is acceptable and the development is not an unduly prominent feature in the locality.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    I have attached the standard plans list condition for certainty. The standard time limit condition is not necessary as the development has already been constructed.

    However, as it is necessary for the installation of obscure glazing in the interests of neighbouring living conditions, a time frame for this amendment is required. There is a strict timetable for compliance in condition 2 because permission is being granted retrospectively, and it is not possible to use a negatively worded condition to secure the approval and implementation of the glazing before the development takes place. The condition will ensure that the development can be enforced against if the requirements are not met. Given the nature of the matter, I consider six months to be a reasonable timeframe.

    In the interests of the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, I have also attached a condition requiring details of the air conditioning condenser unit to be submitted and approved prior to its installation.

    A condition requiring details of how the biodiversity value of the site may be enhanced is necessary in the interest of biodiversity. A condition requiring details of materials to be submitted is not necessary as they are included on the approved plans.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    The proposal accords with the development plan as a whole, thus the appeal should be allowed.

  8. Section 09

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: As Proposed Site Plan 2022.058.PL02A rev A, [name] 2022.058.PL04A rev A and [name] 2022.058.PL06A rev A.

    Unless within six months of the date of this decision the rear facing windows of the development hereby permitted shall be glazed with obscure glass to a level equivalent to [name] 3 or above (or the nearest equivalent standard), the use of the development shall cease until such time as a scheme is approved by the Local Planning Authority and implemented. Upon installation of the obscure glazing specified in this condition, it shall thereafter be retained. In the event of a legal challenge to this decision, or to a decision made pursuant to the procedure set out in this condition, the operation of the time limits specified in this condition will be suspended until that legal challenge has been finally determined.

    Prior to its installation, full details of the air conditioning condenser unit shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. It shall include details on acoustics and vibration, along with any mitigation proposed. The unit shall be installed in accordance with the approved details.

    The development hereby permitted shall not be brought into use until a strategy for the incorporation of features to enhance the biodiversity value of the proposed development, which includes the provision of features for nesting birds, shall have been implemented in accordance with details that shall first have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1499No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    27 March 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    27 February 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3332788
Application reference
23/2018M
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Cheshire East
Planning authority code
E06000049

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
8 November 2023
Valid date
8 November 2023
Start date
23 January 2024
Planning authority decision date
17 August 2023
Appeal decision date
27 March 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
48762
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21