Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3334242

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a part retrospective application for the demolition of existing garage and construction of two storey side extension with front and rear dormers serving the first floor accommodation and first floor rear extension (as previously approved under application ref: 21/2014/FUL) and replacement of dilapidated windows with new aluminium double glazed windows.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a part retrospective application for the demolition of existing garage and construction of two storey side extension with front and rear dormers serving the first floor accommodation and first floor rear extension (as previously approved under application ref: 21/2014/FUL) and replacement of dilapidated windows with new aluminium double glazed windows at Caldbec, [site address] , Loudwater, Hertfordshire, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref: 23/1125/RSP dated 4 July 2023 and in accordance with the conditions set out in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    Planning permission1 for development including the construction of a two storey side extension with front and rear dormers was granted in November 2021 and this has been built. The retrospective application the subject of this appeal is for the same development, but in addition, the application seeks permission for replacement aluminium windows now in place at the appeal property.

    Whilst the principle of double glazed aluminium windows at the appeal property is regarded as acceptable by the Council, the application the subject of this appeal was refused because the Council is not satisfied with the detailing of the windows that have been installed.

    The appeal property is situated in the Loudwater Estate Conservation Area and has an Article 4 Direction removing permitted development rights, including 1 Reference: 21/2014/FUL. changes to windows. Conditions imposed on the November 2021 planning permission included a requirement for Local Planning Authority approval for replacement windows. No such approval was sought. The Council states that an enforcement enquiry2 regarding replacement of the windows is pending consideration.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Loudwater Estate Conservation Area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a chalet style two storey detached dwelling with front and rear dormers. It is situated in a large garden plot and is surrounded by mature trees and tall hedgerows. The dwelling is set well back from the road and is approached via a driveway and parking to the side.

    The appeal property is located in the Loudwater Conservation Area, a low density residential estate characterised by the presence of detached dwellings within large garden plots. Dwellings are located within an undulating woodland setting and together, trees, planting and gardens provide for a notably sylvan setting.

    Further, much of the Loudwater Conservation Area’s significance derives from the presence of Arts and Crafts-style dwellings. [name] noted during my site visit that many dwellings have been altered and/or extended, such changes generally appear in keeping with the character of host dwellings and their surroundings and as such, dwellings retain an attractive range of original features and materials.

    During my site visit, I also observed neighbouring dwellings to demonstrate plentiful examples of modern replacement windows. Whilst these generally respect the original appearance of the host dwellings, they are also very clearly modern and different to original windows. The presence of original fenestration is not a particularly notable feature of this part of the Loudwater Estate Conservation Area and furthermore, window styles and designs vary significantly. 10.The appeal property itself presents various attractive Arts and Crafts features, including a catslide roof, traditional materials and an asymmetrical form. However, the dwelling does not appear prominently within its surroundings. Rather, its situation, set well back on its plot, off-set from the entrance to [site address] and surrounded by mature trees and hedgerows, provides for dwelling that nestles, partly hidden, within its surroundings. 11.I observed during my site visit that the dwelling’s fenestration does not draw particular attention to itself from the wider area but that, where windows can be be seen from the dwelling’s surroundings, they largely appear in keeping with the dwelling’s Arts and Crafts-style design. They do not appear overly bulky nor do they detract from the overall appearance of the dwelling. 2 Reference: 23/0049/COMP. 2 12.Whilst in this regard, the Council has expressed concerns with the thickness of the frames, glazing bar detailing, reflective properties, internal glazing bars and internal and external trickle vents, none of these features draw any attention to themselves in the available views of the dwelling from its surroundings. 13.Further to all of the above, I am mindful that the appellant has provided evidence to demonstrate that original windows were beyond repair and that the replacement windows have provided thermal insulation and health benefits. 14.Taking all of the above into account, I find that the development preserves the character and appearance of the Loudwater Conservation Area and is not contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework; to the Chorleywood Neighbourhood Plan (2020) Policies 1 and 2; to the Council’s Core Strategy (2011) Policy CP12; or to the Council’s Development Management Plan (2013) Policy DM3, which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    Those parts of the development hereby permitted that have not yet been carried out shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision;

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building; 3

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 3402 102 E; and 3402 SP1E.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any other revoking and re-enacting that order with or without modification), no windows or similar openings other than those expressly authorised by this permission shall be constructed in the flank elevations of the extensions hereby approved. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    4 April 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    6 March 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3334242
Application reference
23/1125/RSP
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Three Rivers District Council
Planning authority code
E07000102

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
30 November 2023
Valid date
30 November 2023
Start date
1 February 2024
Planning authority decision date
7 September 2023
Appeal decision date
4 April 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
48987
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21