Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3334544

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as a detached single storey timber bin store.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a detached single storey timber bin store at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref: 2022/24666/HH dated 1 September 2022, and the plans submitted with it.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matter

    At the time of my site visit, the timber bin store was in situ. I also note that the application has been submitted retrospectively, I have dealt with the appeal on this basis.

    Since the submission of the appeal the National Planning Policy Framework has been superseded by the National Planning Policy Framework (2023) as amended (the Framework). However, in relation to this appeal the aims of both sets of policies are similar. No party would be prejudiced or caused any injustice by me proceeding with the appeal in light of this change in policy.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues in this appeal are the effect of the proposed development on (i) the character and appearance of the area; and (ii) the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties.

  4. Section 05

    Character and Appearance

    The appeal property is mid-terrace within a predominantly residential area. The timber shed is located to the front of the appeal site, elevated from the road via a tiered hardstanding area and set down from the floor area of the existing property, which is accessed via steps from the tiered level.

    Whilst sheds similar to the development before me are usually features in rear gardens, I observed during my site visit that there are structures visible in the streetscene including garages, outbuildings and a greenhouse. Vehicles including caravans are parked within the front garden/yard areas of properties within the immediate area and refuse storage is not uncommon to the front of properties.

    Whilst the development is located at an elevated position to the adjacent road, the timber shed is relatively small scale. This combined with the urban streetscene, I find that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area. There is no conflict with policies in the Craven Local Plan 2012 to 2032 (2019) (the Local Plan), in particular Policy ENV3; and the Framework which seeks to ensure development are of a good design, responding to local context and respecting existing and surrounding properties.

  5. Section 06

    Living Conditions

    The timber bin store is located to the front of the appeal site. The shed is at a lower level to the floor level of the host and adjacent properties due to the tiered levels at the front of the site. This along with scale of the shed and its central location providing a degree of separation between the development and the shared boundaries with neighbouring properties ensure detrimental loss of light and overshadowing to neighbouring properties does not occur.

    I conclude that the proposed development would not harm the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties. There is no conflict with the policies in the Local Plan, in particular Policy ENV3 or the Framework which amongst other things seek to protect the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring properties.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.

    Conditions relating to standard time limit for commencement of development, plans to be adhered to and materials to be used are not relevant or necessary as the development is complete.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    19 April 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    7 March 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3334544
Application reference
2022/24666/HH
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
North Yorkshire Council
Planning authority code
Not recorded

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
5 December 2023
Valid date
6 December 2023
Start date
12 December 2023
Planning authority decision date
13 September 2023
Appeal decision date
19 April 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
49827
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21