Appeal 3334544
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as a detached single storey timber bin store.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a detached single storey timber bin store at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref: 2022/24666/HH dated 1 September 2022, and the plans submitted with it.
Section 03
Procedural Matter
At the time of my site visit, the timber bin store was in situ. I also note that the application has been submitted retrospectively, I have dealt with the appeal on this basis.
Since the submission of the appeal the National Planning Policy Framework has been superseded by the National Planning Policy Framework (2023) as amended (the Framework). However, in relation to this appeal the aims of both sets of policies are similar. No party would be prejudiced or caused any injustice by me proceeding with the appeal in light of this change in policy.
Section 04
[name]
The main issues in this appeal are the effect of the proposed development on (i) the character and appearance of the area; and (ii) the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties.
Section 05
Character and Appearance
The appeal property is mid-terrace within a predominantly residential area. The timber shed is located to the front of the appeal site, elevated from the road via a tiered hardstanding area and set down from the floor area of the existing property, which is accessed via steps from the tiered level.
Whilst sheds similar to the development before me are usually features in rear gardens, I observed during my site visit that there are structures visible in the streetscene including garages, outbuildings and a greenhouse. Vehicles including caravans are parked within the front garden/yard areas of properties within the immediate area and refuse storage is not uncommon to the front of properties.
Whilst the development is located at an elevated position to the adjacent road, the timber shed is relatively small scale. This combined with the urban streetscene, I find that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area. There is no conflict with policies in the Craven Local Plan 2012 to 2032 (2019) (the Local Plan), in particular Policy ENV3; and the Framework which seeks to ensure development are of a good design, responding to local context and respecting existing and surrounding properties.
Section 06
Living Conditions
The timber bin store is located to the front of the appeal site. The shed is at a lower level to the floor level of the host and adjacent properties due to the tiered levels at the front of the site. This along with scale of the shed and its central location providing a degree of separation between the development and the shared boundaries with neighbouring properties ensure detrimental loss of light and overshadowing to neighbouring properties does not occur.
I conclude that the proposed development would not harm the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties. There is no conflict with the policies in the Local Plan, in particular Policy ENV3 or the Framework which amongst other things seek to protect the amenities of occupiers of neighbouring properties.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.
Conditions relating to standard time limit for commencement of development, plans to be adhered to and materials to be used are not relevant or necessary as the development is complete.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 19 April 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 7 March 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3334544
- Application reference
- 2022/24666/HH
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- North Yorkshire Council
- Planning authority code
- Not recorded
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 5 December 2023
- Valid date
- 6 December 2023
- Start date
- 12 December 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 19 April 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 49827
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21