Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3334669

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

conversion of roof space to habitable use including rear dormer and 3 front roof lights.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for conversion of roof space to habitable use including rear dormer and 3 front roof lights at [site address] , Uxbridge, Hillingdon, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 15924/APP/2023/1855, dated 25 June 2023 and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1385-3, 1385-4, 1385-5 [name] and 1385-6 [name].

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main issue

    I consider that the main issue in this case is its effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [site address] is a detached two storey house set back from the road in a good sized plot. It has had a number of extensions over time. It is in an established residential area and in an Area of Special Local Character. Other properties along the same side of the street are typically large, detached houses in a wide variety of designs in good sized plots along no regular building line. The properties on the other side of the road follow a more regular building line but are also typically large detached houses.

    The policies relevant in this case include policies BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: [name] – [name] (November 2012) and DMHB5, DMHB11, DMHB12 and DMHD1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: [name] – Development Management policies (January 2020) (the local plan) and D3 of the London Plan (2021). These relate to the design quality of new development, including extensions which, among other things, should be sympathetic to the host building and harmonise with the local environment. Roof extensions should be, among other things, located to the rear, subservient to the scale of the existing roof and no higher than the existing main ridge.

    Areas of Special Local Character are a local designation by which the Council seeks to preserve and enhance the special character of the area and where it is important that extensions are appropriate to the building and cause no harm to the street scene in terms of matters including scale and height.

    The proposal includes the raising of the roof over the existing side extension to the same height as the existing ridge line of the main part of the house. I consider that this would not appear overly large or bulky when viewed from the street either in the context of the existing house itself or the surroundings. It would be similar in size to the neighbouring property, No. 10, and although the crown roof would increase its apparent bulk, it would not result in the roof appearing top heavy and its impact on the street scene would be minimal due to its set back from the road. The architectural detail of the front projecting gable and entrance would remain to add interest to the front elevation.

    The effect of the proposed alterations to the rear including the dormer windows would be to rationalise the existing haphazard and disjointed additions into a more unified appearance.

    I consider that, although the increase in height of the roof over the existing side element would result in that part of the house no longer being subservient to the main part, the proposal as a whole would not result in an inappropriate or incongruous addition to the house or compromise its architectural integrity. It would not appear out of keeping with the scale, height, design or building lines in the street scene or the local area in general where the houses are typically large and irregularly sited within their plots and in relation to the road.

    I conclude that the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the house or the surrounding area and that in this respect it is consistent with local plan policies BE1, DMHB5, DMHB11, DMHB12 and DMHD1, and D3 of the London Plan.

    For the reasons given above, the appeal is allowed.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered the conditions put forward by the Council, having regard to the tests set out in the Framework. A condition detailing the plans is necessary to ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and for the avoidance of doubt. A condition relating to the materials is necessary in order to ensure the satisfactory appearance of the development.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 764No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    9 April 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    20 March 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3334669
Application reference
15924/APP/2023/1855
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Planning authority code
E09000017

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
70 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 December 2023
Valid date
11 December 2023
Start date
2 February 2024
Planning authority decision date
25 September 2023
Appeal decision date
9 April 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
49238
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21