Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3336590

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a two storey rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a two storey rear extension at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2023/2547, dated 22 September 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1:500 Site Plan; and Elevations and [name] dated August 2023.

    The external materials shall match those of the existing dwelling.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The council’s concern relates only to the first floor element of the extension, suggesting that it would be uncharacteristic and detract from the character and appearance of this residential terrace. The extension would follow the form of the existing outrigger and would be just over a metre deep. This would result in it sitting proud of the other half of the outrigger on the neighbouring property. However, this disparity would be very limited and the property would retain its existing form and appearance. The works would be to the back of the terrace where other rear extensions and roof additions are far from consistent. The rear elevation is not visible from the public domain. www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate Appeal Decision: APP/Y5420/D/24/3336590

    Despite the minor depth disparity with the neighbouring outrigger, the proposal would be in keeping with the form, design and detailing of the property. It would not result in any material change to the character or appearance of the area. It would not therefore result in conflict with the design aspirations of policies DM1 or DM12 of the Development Management - Development Plan Document (2017) or policy SP11 of the Haringey Local Plan - [name] 2013 – 2026 (2017).

    The purpose of the extension is to increase the size of the third bedroom to meet minimum space standards. This is a matter that weighs heavily in favour of the proposal. In these circumstances, the works would not be at odds with the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 which supports development that functions well and adds to the overall quality of the area.

    As there are no other matters that weigh significantly against the proposal, I allow the appeal. I have imposed conditions relating to the commencement of development and the details of the approved plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. I have also required that the materials match the existing to ensure that it has a satisfactory appearance.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 341No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted site visit dates
    23 April 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3336590
Application reference
HGY/2023/2547
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Haringey
Planning authority code
E09000014

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
9 January 2024
Valid date
9 January 2024
Start date
29 February 2024
Planning authority decision date
1 December 2023
Appeal decision date
8 May 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
50653
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21