Appeal 3336744
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the construction of two first-floor, rear infill extensions.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the construction of two first-floor, rear infill extensions at [site address] , in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 6/2023/2095/HOUSE, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following
Section 03
conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: JND/1087/20; JND/1087/21; JND/1087/22; JND/1087/23; JND/1087/24; JND/1087/25; JND/1087/26; JND/1087/28.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed extensions on the character and appearance of the area around [address].
Section 05
Reasons
No 4 is a detached, two-storey house situated on the south side of [address]. The site slopes up from the road and also slopes up from east to west along the road. The houses along the road are all detached and of varying designs. The appeal property has a gable front with a side two-storey element having a half-hipped roof sloping down as a cat-slide style roof at the rear. The proposed development would involve the construction of a rear first-floor extension at the western end. This would effectively convert the cat-slide roof into a flat-roofed extension. There would be a further side/rear extension at the eastern side creating what effectively would be a flat-roofed dormer.
Policy SP9 of the Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Local Plan 2016-2036 (LP), indicates that proposals should be informed by an analysis of the site's character and context so that they relate well to their surroundings and local distinctiveness, including the wider townscape. The Northaw and Cuffley Neighbourhood Plan (NP) has been adopted by the Council and I can afford it significant weight. Policy D2 of the NP indicates that proposals for extensions to existing properties, should respond positively to the Northaw and [name]. The Design Code notes that a newly built extension should not overwhelm the building from any given point.
In this case, the appeal property has a mix of ridge and hipped roofs. The proposed extensions would be at the rear of the property and would be largely set behind the main roof structure. They would also be set below the ridge lines of the main roofs such that they would not be readily visible in the street scene. I note that there is a flat-roofed dormer-style extension at No 2, while Nos 1, 2 and 3 have large flat-roofed garages in prominent positions projecting forward of the front elevations. In the context of the surrounding area along this part of the road, therefore, there are a wide range of designs and roof types, such that flat roofs are a significant feature. The proposed eastern dormer at No 4 would only be partly visible from the road due to boundary screening and the height of the front part of the house above road level.
The Council contends that the proposed extensions would be visible from the properties at the rear, but there are only two houses in easy view and the rear of No 4 is partly screened from these by boundary planting. The extensions would not increase the footprint of the house and would be largely absorbed into the existing roofs, such that they would not appear incoherent or incongruous, nor would they fail to appear subordinate or out of scale.
In conclusion, I find that the proposed extensions would not be harmful to the character and appearance of the area along [address], nor would they fail to relate well to the appearance and proportions of the host dwelling. On this basis, they would not conflict with Policy SP9 of the LP or with Policy 2 and the Cuffley local character assessment in the NP. Accordingly, I allow this appeal subject to the conditions above.
Section 06
Conditions
I have attached a condition relating to plans because it is necessary that the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. I have attached a further condition relating to materials in the interests of the visual amenities of the area.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 239No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 30 July 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 16 July 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3336744
- Application reference
- 6/2023/2095/HOUSE
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Welwyn Hatfield Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000241
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 11 January 2024
- Valid date
- 21 January 2024
- Start date
- 19 February 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 11 December 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 30 July 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 54797
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21