Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3338190

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for the erection of a rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for a rear extension at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 23/02518, dated 11 October 2023, subject to the following conditions: -

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans: - 1394.00 Location Plan, 1394.01 Block Plan and 1394.03 [name] and Elevations.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matter

    The Council altered the description to include reference to the existing dormer window, however, there is nothing before me that indicates an agreement to the revised description. Therefore, I have used the description as set out on the planning application form.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    No.57 is a two-storey property and reflects the semi-detached houses to the eastern side of [address]. On the other side are terraced properties, however there is a consistency in design and materials.

    Principle 10.1 of the Borough Wide Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) indicates that extensions will be expected to be subordinate and respond positively to the form, scale and architectural style & materials of the original building.

    The hipped roof to the appeal property has been altered to a gable end and a large dormer window and a single-storey extension have been added to the rear. Extending over the existing ground floor extension the proposed first-floor element is designed with the section adjoining the neighbour inset to half the depth of the ground floor, and the double-hipped roof is set down from the main ridge line. The extension reflects the form and materials of the original property and echoes the design of the two-storey rear extension to No.53, which is visible from the appeal property’s garden.

    In combination with the existing dormer, the proposal would add significant mass to the original property. The roof of the proposed extension would project partially over the dormer and whilst this adds to the bulk, I agree with the appellant that it would reduce its boxy appearance and aid its integration with the rest of the property. The large dormer is an imposing and dominant feature and does not reflect the Council’s SPD guidance for roof alterations. However, it has been implemented under permitted development rights and as such the design is not controlled, and the impact of such provisions is recognised in the Windsor Neighbourhood Plan - Design Guidance1.

    Having regard to the proposed development, the rear extension would be proportionate and subservient, reflecting the advice in the SPD. The existing dormer creates a harsh cliff edge to the rear elevation with the profile seen from [address], and on balance, I find that the rear addition would help to assimilate the discordant feature, improving the proportions and overall appearance of the property.

    In conclusion, the proposed development would not be harmful to the character and appearance of the area and would therefore accord with policy QP3 of the Borough Local Plan, policy DES.01 of the Neighbourhood Plan and principle 10.1 of the Borough Wide Design Guide SPD. Together these promote subservient extensions which respond to the original building and that respect and enhance the local environment. It would also accord with the design requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    The Council has also raised concerns in relation to the accuracy of the plans. The application plan 139.03 shows the elevations and floorplans at different scales, but there is only a single scale bar. However, several dimensions are also labelled, and the floorplans and elevations match, thereby the size of the extension is clearly defined.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Conditions

    For the reasons set out the appeal is allowed subject to the standard conditions relating to the commencement of development and compliance with the submitted plans. Also, in the interest of the character and appearance of the area, a condition is necessary to ensure that the development is carried out with materials to match the host property. 1 Windsor Neighbourhood Plan Design Guide 29 June 2021 Appendix 2 Page 10

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 362No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 June 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    19 May 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3338190
Application reference
23/02518
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning authority code
E06000040

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
5 February 2024
Valid date
7 March 2024
Start date
12 March 2024
Planning authority decision date
29 January 2024
Appeal decision date
3 June 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
51898
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21