Appeal 3338472
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the erection of a detached domestic garage with storage above.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of a detached domestic garage with storage above at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/00909/FUL, dated 18 September 2023 and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Drainage Plan, Existing Site Plan, Proposed Site Plan, Site Location Plan, Proposed Floor Plan and Proposed garage elevations.
The materials to be used in the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing garage/annex unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The development hereby permitted shall be used for purposes incidental or ancillary to the residential use of the dwelling known as [site address] and for no other purpose.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) including the mitigation measures detailed within the FRA. The mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to first use of the development, or within any other period as may subsequently be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The building hereby approved shall not be used until an electric vehicle recharging point has been installed. Such electric vehicle recharging point shall be maintained and retained for that purpose thereafter.
Prior to first use of the building, details of soft landscaping shall be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The landscaping details shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details, prior to first use of the development and shall thereafter be retained and maintained. Any trees or shrubs planted in accordance with this condition which are removed, uprooted, destroyed, die or become severely damaged or seriously diseased within 7 years of planting or any trees or shrubs planted as replacements shall be replaced within the next planting season by trees or shrubs of similar size and species to those originally required to be planted, unless the Local Planning Authority gives its written consent to any variation.
Section 03
Procedural Matter
[name] 2023 the Government published its revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). In this instance the issues most relevant to the appeal remain unaffected by the revisions to the Framework. I am therefore satisfied that there is no requirement to seek further submissions on the revised Framework and that no party would be disadvantaged by such a cause of action.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue in the appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal property, [site address] ( [site address] ) is an extended detached dwelling situate in a row of development on [site address] , a residential road north of the settlement of Hambleton leading to open countryside. There are a variety of properties along this part of [site address] , including a cattery, and holiday lets together with detached dwellings set back from the highway with mature landscaping. [site address] has a generous sized plot with a long rear garden leading to an open aspect at the rear with fields beyond. It is set back and at a higher level from [site address] and is well screened from its neighbouring properties, Northways and Newlands.
Planning permission was granted in 2023 for the change of use of an existing garage to provide ancillary accommodation1. The proposal would see the erection of a new garage between the former garage/annex and a stable/storage shed located towards the north end of the appeal site. Due to its height and width, it would be larger than these two outbuildings and its footprint would be similar to the original footprint of [site address] . However, the appeal site easily has sufficient size to accommodate a garage of this size and due to its siting set well back within the long rear garden, it would not be visible from [site address] . Given its distance from the adjacent dwellings it would not be discernibly visible from these properties either. Nor would the 1 23/00653/FUL garage unduly dominate in views from [address] where my observations were that despite the open countryside setting, the presence of built development along [address] and commercial stables means that views of the appeal site are not easily noticeable. Further, boundary landscaping which could be secured by condition would provide an element of screening to the appeal site. As such the proposal would not cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area.
I appreciate the concern of the Council that the height and appearance of the proposed garage would not be subservient to the dwelling itself and larger in relation to the other outbuildings found on the appeal site. However, the visual impact would be relatively localised with the full extent of the outbuildings and their relationship with the dwelling only being seen within the appeal site itself. In the context of the generous plot size, it would not appear duly incongruous. Further whilst it would add to the extent of built development in this location, I noted on my site visit that Northways itself is a dwelling substantially larger than other dwellings on [site address] whilst Newlands has a number of outbuildings and garages associated with its use as a cattery. I cannot therefore agree that the proposal would significantly compromise and cause harm to the open and rural character found in this area.
I note that the Council has raised no concerns with regard to the amenity of the occupiers of neighbouring properties and having regard to the distances involved I would concur with this assessment. [name] note that the Council are satisfied that no unacceptable impact on flooding and drainage would arise.
The Wyre Local Plan (2011-2031) (incorporating partial update 2022) (Local Plan) includes Policy SP4 which seeks to protect the open and rural character of the area. From all I have seen and read I am satisfied that the proposal would not adversely impact on the open and rural character of the area and would therefore not run contrary to the objectives of this policy. I am also satisfied that the proposal would comply with Policy CDMP3 of the Local Plan which requires development to be of a high standard of design.
Section 06
Conditions
The Council has suggested a number of conditions. A condition as to timescales and for the development to be carried out in accordance with listed approved plans and the flood risk assessment submitted with the application are necessary for the avoidance of doubt and in the interest of flood risk mitigation. As no details are given in respect of phasing, I have amended the latter condition to acknowledge this. Conditions in respect of materials to ensure visual amenity and that the garage is ancillary to the main dwelling to prevent the creation of a separate unit are also necessary. The Council also seeks a condition in respect of EV charging which is necessary in the interests of air quality. [name] note within the delegated report that the Council refer to the imposition of a condition for obscure glazing to the south facing elevation of the garage, this is not suggested in the list of conditions provided by the Council. Be that as it may, such a condition is not in my view necessary given the distances involved and that the window serves only a staircase. A landscaping condition is also required in the interest of visual amenity and to ensure a successful planting scheme.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons given and having taken all other matters into account I allow the appeal as set out in the formal decision notice above.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1974No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 9 May 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 22 April 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3338472
- Application reference
- 23/00909/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Wyre Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000128
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 8 February 2024
- Valid date
- 8 February 2024
- Start date
- 6 March 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 21 November 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 9 May 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 50798
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21