Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3338514

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

formation of additional storage at lower ground floor front light well and bin storage to front garden with enhanced planting without complying with a condition attached to planning permission [name]/21/06865, dated 14 December 2021.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for Formation of additional storage at lower ground floor front light well and bin storage to front garden with enhanced planting at [site address] in accordance with the application [name]/23/07216 dated 2 November 2023 without complying with condition No 2. set out in planning permission [name]/21/06865 granted on 14 December 2021 by The Council of The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, but otherwise subject to the conditions set out in [name].

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is whether or not the amended condition would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Pembridge Conservation Area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site comprises a four storey mid-terraced building located on [address]. It lies within the Pembridge Conservation Area. The Conservation area covers a large part of the local area. It is characterised by predominantly residential buildings. I also saw that within the wider conservation area there are a number of low walls facing the highway – some with just capping stones and others with capping stones; with railings either inserted or placed upon.

    Put simply, the Appellant wishes to ‘vary’ the original drawings approved in 2021 so that the boundary wall to the front of the building is raised. This would be to a height of no greater than 950mm (as shown on drawing JCA- 0759-100-PE-FR) with railings on top.

    The Council’s points out their view that the height of the existing front boundary walls within the terrace are consistent, with slight variation associated with the natural slope in the road. The proposed increase in the height of the front boundary wall at No. 14 would disrupt this uniformity, which would be further exacerbated with the addition of the proposed disproportionate, shorter, squat railings above. This would cause the front boundary to appear incongruous, visually obtrusive, and at odds with the prevailing pattern of development along this terrace, to the detriment of the character and appearance of the street scene and conservation area.

    [name] note that the proposed wall would be higher than those directly adjacent, this is not an uncharacteristic feature of the wider conservation area or the locality more generally. As such, at the very least, it would preserve the character and appearance of the Pembridge Conservation Area, the duty to which is set out in s72(1) of the PLBCAA.

    Accordingly, the proposal would accord with Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6 and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019, which, amongst other aims seek to ensure that alterations and additions do not harm the existing character and appearance of the building and its context. It would also accord with the aims of the Pembridge Conservation Area Appraisal which indicates that ‘For all buildings identified here as positive buildings, change must be managed to conserve and, where appropriate, enhance their significance in accordance with national and local planning policies’. The proposal would also accord with the Policies of the National Planning Policy Framework, including those set out in Chapter 16 - Conserving and enhancing the historic environment.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal should succeed. I will grant a new planning permission without the disputed condition, but substituting it with the drawings listed on the refused decision notice of 2023, and restating those undisputed conditions that are still subsisting and capable of taking effect.

  5. Section 06

    [name]

    [name]. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. Reason - As required by Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, to avoid the accumulation of unexercised Planning Permissions.

    Compliance with approved drawings. The development shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the details shown on submitted plans JCA-0759-001-[name] P1, JCA-0759-002-[name] P1, JCA- 0759-100-[name] P1, JCA-0759-101-[name] P1. Reason - The details are material to the acceptability of the proposals, and to ensure accordance with the development plan.

    Planting and replanting. All tree and shrub planting forming part of the plans and details approved through this planning permission shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding season following the first occupation of the development or the completion of the development whichever is the sooner. Any trees or shrubs which, within a period of five years from the first planting and seeding season referred to above, die, are removed, or become seriously damaged or diseased, shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species. Reason - To protect the appearance and amenity of the area and to accord with policies of the development plan, in particular policy CR6 of the Local Plan 2019.

    Black painted railings and gate. The front boundary railings and gate shall be painted black, and so maintained. Reason - To preserve or enhance the appearance of the building and/or the character of the area, in accordance with policies of the development plan in particular policies CL1, and CL6 of the of the Local Plan 2019.

    Materials - To match existing. All work and work of making good shall be finished to match the existing exterior of the building(s) in respect of materials, colour, texture, profile and, in the case of brickwork, facebond and pointing, and shall be so maintained. Reason - To preserve or enhance the appearance of the building and/or the character of the area in accordance with policies of the development plan in particular policies CL1, CL2, CL3 and CL6 of the Local Plan 2019.

    Porous surfaces. All external hard surfacing in the development shall be constructed using porous materials and so maintained thereafter. If any permeable surfaces are removed, they must be replaced only with permeable surfaces. Reason – To reduce flood risk and to contribute to sustainability in accordance with policy CE2 of the Local Plan 2019

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 5458No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted site visit dates
    28 May 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3338514
Application reference
PP/23/07216
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Planning authority code
E09000020

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
2. Refused permission to vary or remove a condition(s)
Appeal reason
Appeal Against Conditions
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
0 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
9 February 2024
Valid date
25 February 2024
Start date
25 April 2024
Planning authority decision date
4 January 2024
Appeal decision date
29 May 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
51741
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21