Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3338616

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a side and rear extension to the detached garage.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a side and rear extension to the detached garage at [site address] , in accordance with the terms of planning application Ref.23/02310/HHOLD dated 8 November 2023, subject to the following

  2. Section 03

    conditions:

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the following approved plans: 01508/PL01 & 01508/PL02.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The appeal site is located within the [site address] Conservation Area “CA”. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the CA and Residential Area of Special Character “RASC”.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    [site address] is a large modern detached two and a half storey property with a large front forecourt and electronic gates. It is located within a cluster of similarly-sized detached properties in their own grounds in the [site address] CA. It is also within a Residential Area of Special Character which is applied through Policy DES3 of the Reigate and Banstead Development Management Plan (adopted 2019).

    The proposal seeks the extension of a brick built double garage which sits forward of the front elevation of the main house and near the south west corner of the house. The garage is currently an L-shape. The enlarged garage would include a domestic workshop.

    The neighbouring property to the south is [address] and this has a garage to its front elevation which is located very approximately 1m from the common boundary with [site address] . Garages in the immediate area tend to be located in the front forecourt areas of the dwellings.

    The extension would be constructed in brick to match the existing roof of the garage and the roof would be pitched. A small element of hidden flat roof would be created behind the main pitch allowing the insertion of a glazed roof lantern to bring light into the garage and workshop space.

    In determining this application, I have borne in mind the statutory duty to pay special attention to preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Conservation Area. In this case, the CA is characterised by substantial trees and greenery, spacious plots and holly hedges. There is a mature landscape providing an attractive setting for large individually designed properties set well behind the road frontage in generous plots. The special residential character derives from similar characteristics and seeks to retain spaciousness, amongst other things.

    The proposed enlarged footprint of the garage/workshop would be predominantly to the south of the existing garage where it would extend to about 1m from the common boundary with the plot of [address]. The remainder of the enlargement would be to the east in the overlap with the side (south) elevation of the main house. Whilst it would reduce the distance from the common boundary with [address] from about 5.6m to about 1.1m, the mass of the proposal would not be dominant nor appear too close to [address] buildings. It would not cramp the appearance of [site address] or visually encroach into the front forecourt.

    The roof structure would be more noticeable from the road but not to the extent of causing detrimental visual impacts. Views from the road are limited and would continue to be so. Whilst green vegetation has been removed from the front area of [site address] pursuant to consents, some replacement planting has taken place. There would be some further loss of greenery but not a material loss which would warrant refusing planning permission. The height, depth, elevations, scale and massing of the proposal would respect the form of neighbouring buildings and there would be no harmful erosion of the spacing between buildings leading to an over-dominance of built form within the plot. 10.I conclude that the proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the [site address] Conservation Area and would respect the RASC. It would not be contrary to policies DES1, DES3 or NHE9 of the Reigate and Banstead Development Management Plan (adopted 2019), the Reigate and [name] (adopted 2014), the Council's Local Character & Distinctiveness Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2021) or the Council's Householder Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Guidance (2004).

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4043No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    17 June 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    23 May 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3338616
Application reference
23/02310/HHOLD
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000211

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
12 February 2024
Valid date
23 February 2024
Start date
13 March 2024
Planning authority decision date
4 January 2024
Appeal decision date
17 June 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
52574
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21