Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3339069

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

extension to existing loft conversion to include hip to gable conversion – installation of rear dormer and two number front roof light windows and front porch.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for erection of extension to existing loft conversion to include hip to gable conversion – installation of rear dormer and two number front roof light windows and front porch at [site address] , Hillingdon, [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 20106/APP/2023/3090, dated 24 October 2023, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1:1250 site plan, NORTHWOOD/01, NORTHWOOD/02, NORTHWOOD/03, NORTHWOOD/04.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main issue

    I consider that the main issue in this case is its effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [site address] is a two storey semi-detached house which has been converted into two flats. Properties along the street are mainly two storey detached and semi-detached houses in a variety of styles, which typically include strong forward gables and bay windows. There is a large school and open grassed area on the opposite side of the road.

    The relevant policies in this case include policies BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: [name] – [name] (November 2012) and DMHB11, DMHB12 and DMHD1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: [name] – Development Management policies (January 2020) (the local plan). These relate to the design quality of new development, including extensions, which, among other things, should be sympathetic to the host building and harmonise with the local environment. Roof extensions should be located to the rear and subservient to the scale of the existing roof.

    The proposed extension to the roof space would result in a new gable element replacing the existing hipped roof. It would be over that part of the building which is set back from the main front gable which is shared with the adjoining semi-detached house, No. 116, and which dominates the combined frontage of the building as a whole. Although it would alter the existing composition and symmetry of the building, I consider that it would integrate with the appearance of the building. It would not result in a disproportionate increase in bulk and its scale would be in keeping with the varied house styles along the street. There would be no increase in height above that of the main ridge.

    I consider that the design of the hip to gable roof is appropriate in the context of the general character of the surrounding area. It would be set back from the main front gable and would not result in an over-large extension. There would be no adverse cumulative effect on the character and appearance of the street scene where there is a variety of roof forms, including a similar example further along the street to the east.

    The proposed rear dormer, although out of proportion with the existing roof, would be set away from the ridge, eaves and sides of the new roof and in proportion with it. It would exceed two thirds of the width of the original roof but the window glazing would be aligned with that of the first floor windows below. Although overall the dormer would be larger than the guidance in policy DMHD1, it would not be readily visible from public viewpoints and this element alone would not be sufficient to justify dismissing the appeal.

    I conclude that overall the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the building or the street scene and surrounding area and that in this respect it is consistent with local plan policies BE1, DMHB11, DMHB12 and DMHD1.

    For the reasons given above, the appeal is allowed.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered the conditions put forward by the Council, having regard to the tests set out in the Framework. A condition detailing the plans is necessary to ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans and for the avoidance of doubt. A condition relating to the materials is necessary in order to ensure the satisfactory appearance of the development.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 764No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted site visit dates
    24 April 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3339069
Application reference
20106/APP/2023/3090
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Planning authority code
E09000017

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
19 February 2024
Valid date
19 February 2024
Start date
11 March 2024
Planning authority decision date
20 December 2023
Appeal decision date
8 May 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
50688
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21