Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3340211

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of new bin store.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of new bin store at [site address] , Barford, Warwickshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/23/1488, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: Existing & [name] & Elevations – [name]: 4132-03B.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    Prior to its installation, details of the door, including materials, finish and detailed design, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issues are whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the [name] listed building, [name]; and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barford Conservation Area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [name] is an attractive [name] listed 17th century timber framed barn which has been converted to a dwelling. It is 2 storey, with a pitched tiled roof and includes in part, brick infill panels, and a brick gable with a modern chimney stack to the flank elevation. From the evidence before me, the special interest and significance of the listed building, insofar as relevant to this proposal, are largely derived from its architectural and historic interest. The building is experienced within the setting of the surrounding residential development, including car parking, a pitched roof garage and flat roof garage block off set from the rear of the property, with an intervening brick boundary wall containing a gated opening which provides access to the rear garden.

    The site is located within the Barford Conservation Area (the CA). The significance of the CA is mainly derived from the quality and mixture of historic buildings and their relationship to each other and the surrounding streets. The listed building occupies a prominent corner plot, whereby both the front and side elevations of the building are visible from [address]. As such, it contributes positively to the character and appearance of the area and the significance of the CA as a heritage asset.

    The appeal proposal would see the erection of a bin store, formed by the construction of 2 sections of brick wall, which alongside the existing garden wall and side elevation of the garage would create an enclosed area. It would be located on an existing area of hardstanding to the rear of the listed building and accessed by a pedestrian door to the front wall and from the rear garden of the property through an existing opening in the boundary wall.

    The bin store would be of a simple form, designed to meet the functional requirements of the appellant. It is modest in scale, lower in height and not dissimilar in appearance to the existing boundary wall that runs between the house and garage. Although it would be seen in the same context as the listed building, due to its position, set back from the side gable, and overall scale, the structure would not interfere with views of the side elevation of the host dwelling, nor would it significantly encroach into views of the frontage of the listed building.

    Consequently, the proposed bin store would not appear as a visually disruptive or unduly dominant feature within the setting of the listed building. It would therefore preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and the contribution that its setting makes to its significance.

    Notwithstanding its position and visibility from some parts of [address], the bin store would be viewed against the backdrop of the existing garage and boundary wall. Moreover, by virtue of its design, scale and height, the proposal would not appear as a visually intrusive or incongruous feature in the street scape. Considering these factors, and given the context of the appeal property, the bin store would not appear at odds with the prevailing character of the area. In that regard it would not detract from the character and appearance of the CA.

    For the reasons given above, the proposed bin store would not harm the setting and significance of the listed building and would preserve the character and appearance of the CA and its significance as a heritage asset. It would therefore accord with Policy HE1 of the Warwick District Local Plan 2011-2029 adopted 2017, which sets out that development will not be permitted where it will adversely affect the setting of a listed building, and Policy B6 of the Barford Neighbourhood Plan 2014 – 2029, which expects all new development within the Conservation Area and/or within the setting of a listed building to preserve and wherever possible enhance the positive attributes of the heritage asset. It would also accord with the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) in respect of the historic environment.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard condition in relation to the time period for the implementation of the permission, a condition specifying the approved plans is necessary to provide certainty. I have not imposed a condition to require samples of the external materials to be submitted as suggested by the Council, but rather a condition to require the materials to be used to match those in the existing building, which is necessary and would provide adequate assurance regarding the appearance of the development and in the interests of the heritage assets. A condition to require details of the door is necessary, in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the listed building. I have excluded the reference to windows, eaves, verges and rainwater goods from the Council’s suggested condition as these elements are not relevant to the appeal proposal.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4746No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    19 August 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    14 August 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3340211
Application reference
W/23/1488
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Warwick District Council
Planning authority code
E07000222

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
11 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 March 2024
Valid date
13 March 2024
Start date
13 May 2024
Planning authority decision date
26 January 2024
Appeal decision date
19 August 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
55841
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21