Appeal 3341686
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
9 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
alteration of approved 4 garages under planning ref APP/D465/D/14/2219820 to create 2 secure garages and upper floor home office.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for 2 secure garages and upper floor office at [site address] , Wolverhampton [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/01268/FUL, dated 30 November 2023, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions listed in the schedule at the end of this decision.
Section 03
[name]
The main issues are the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene, and the effect on the living condition of residents at [address] regarding outlook.
Section 04
Character and appearance
The appeal building is a detached dwelling located in a mainly residential area alongside the busy [address]. There are commercial properties and the Crown public house nearby on the opposite side of the road. The site has an extant permission for a two-storey extension with sheltered garages and a summerhouse. Works to the main dwelling were completed in 2020. That permission was for a block of four garages aligned alongside the southern boundary wall of the site. The appeal proposal relates to a block of two garages and a storeroom with a home office above, to be sited alongside the western boundary.
Dwellings in the locality vary in size, form, and design with no regularity in character. The proposed garage block would be of a distinctive design with a pitched roof and arched doorways to match the arched window at the house. Although it would be higher than the previously allowed four garages block it would be in scale with the size of the dwelling. Its siting, next to the site boundary and with a gable end wall facing [address], would create a positive sense of enclosure to the property. Although the end wall of the garage would be prominent when viewed from [address] there are other large buildings nearby relatively close to the road at the [address]/[address] junction. Subject to appropriate conditions, the proposal would cause no significant harm to the street scene. It would therefore comply with Black Country Core Strategy (BCCS) policies ENV3 and CSP4 concerning design quality and place-making, Saved Unitary Development Plan (UDP) policies D4, D7, D8 and D9 which together, amongst other things, seek that proposals reinforce local distinctiveness and are of appropriate scale and massing, and Tetenhall Neighbourhood Plan policy TNP which requires new buildings to respect the character of the area.
Section 05
Effect on Living Conditions
The appeal site is over one metre lower than the garden of the adjacent dwelling of [address]. Windows in the front elevation of that building would allow angled views of the roof of the proposed garage building. However, there would be a significant separation distance, given that the dwelling is around 26 metres from the side boundary of [site address] . The uppermost part of a small outbuilding may be seen next to, and above, the concrete block boundary wall at the appeal site. Some small pyramidal conifers have also been planted in the garden of [address] at the rear of that boundary wall.
The appeal proposal would be around one metre higher than the approved block of four sheltered garages. I consider that the modest increase in height, intervening vegetation, and distance from the front elevation of [address] would not result in a significant increased loss of outlook for the occupiers of [address] from their dwelling or rear garden when compared to the visual impact from the fall-back sheltered garage scheme. The proposal would therefore comply with Black Country Core Strategy (BCCS) policies ENV3 and CSP4 and Saved Unitary Development Plan (UDP) policies D7 and D8 which seek to avoid overbearing development and to protect peoples’ amenities including their immediate outlook.
Section 06
Other Matters
Although the Council cites its Supplementary Planning Guidance 3 Residential Development in the reasons for refusal, no specific reference is provided.
I acknowledge that the proposal has been designed to provide the benefit of enabling natural surveillance of the property in the interest of reducing any anti-social behaviour and fear of crime. This is a matter which adds weight to my decision.
Section 07
Conditions
In addition to the standard condition regarding the timescale for the development, a condition is added to confirm the approved plans. Matching external materials are required to protect the character and appearance of the area. Conditions restrict the use of the building to incidental use associated with the dwelling with no residential or other use, in the interest of residential amenity. Conditions are also imposed to remove permitted development rights in respect of extensions and additional windows to protect the amenity of neighbours.
Section 08
Conclusion
For the reasons given above the appeal is allowed, subject to conditions.
Section 09
Schedule of conditions
The development herby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be in accordance with the following approved plans: 120_002 Proposed site plan and 120_003 Proposed garage plans and elevations.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those in the existing building.
The development hereby permitted shall be used only for purposes incidental to the use of the dwelling house and not for any commercial, industrial, or business purpose.
The development hereby permitted shall be used as part of the dwelling house and shall not be used as a separate dwelling.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any other revoking, replacing and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no further windows or other form of opening above ground floor level including roof lights shall not be introduced into the rear and side elevation of the garage hereby permitted.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any other revoking, replacing, and re-enacting of that Order with or without modification) there shall be no extension and no roof extension of the garage forming part of the development hereby permitted, without prior planning permission being obtained.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 108No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 12 June 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 14 May 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3341686
- Application reference
- 23/01268/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Planning authority code
- E08000031
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 28 March 2024
- Valid date
- 5 April 2024
- Start date
- 24 April 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 15 February 2024
- Appeal decision date
- 12 June 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 52364
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21