Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3341858

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

first floor side & single storey rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for proposed first floor side & single storey rear extension at [site address] , Wolverhampton, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/01362/FUL, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1314132/102B and 134123/105.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of [site address] and the surrounding area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is in an established residential area. Firsway consists of a mix of detached houses and bungalows. The appeal property is detached and set back from the pavement. The development would create a bedroom and bathroom to adjoin the existing side elevation at first floor level.

    The appeal scheme was amended before the Council made its decision to provide a set back from the front elevation and set down from the original roof height of the property. The plans demonstrate that the development is also set in from the boundary with 14 Firsway resulting in a proportionate and subservient design to the host property. It does not detract from the character of [site address] nor the surrounding area.

    The open character of the street scene is maintained due to the set back of the properties from the pavement. The natural incline of the road, the orientation and relationship of properties also ensures that the street does not feel enclosed. There is little uniformity on Firsway and the surrounding area due to the variation of design of the properties. Consequently, the development would not detract from the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

    In conclusion, the development would not harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area nor [site address] . Accordingly, I find no conflict with policies ENV3 and CSP4 of the Black Country Core Strategy, Policies D4, D7, D8 and D9 of the Wolverhampton Unitary Development Plan and policy TNP12 [name] of the Tettenhall Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2016. These policies require a high level of design that assimilates with and respects the existing character of the surrounding area. For the same reasons the development accords with the Extension to Houses Supplementary Planning Guidance No 4 which seeks to ensure that domestic extensions are well designed.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    The Council has indicated that the site is adjacent to Wightwick Bank Conservation Area (the CA) in the Questionnaire and has provided a plan showing the extent of the CA. The appeal site is some distance from the boundary of the CA and there is intervening development such that the appeal site does not contribute to the significance of this heritage asset. Consequently, the development itself would not harm the significance of the CA as a designated heritage asset.

    Objections to the appeal development have been made by an interested party. These include concerns about the effect of the appeal scheme on the appearance of the area which I have already dealt with. With regard to restrictions on the design of development at Firsway, including gaps between buildings for maintenance purposes, there is no evidence to demonstrate that these are subject to planning control. I also have limited information about the planning history of the garage at the appeal site. There is also no evidence to show that rainwater discharge cannot be properly contained within the appeal site. The devaluation of properties is not considered to be a material consideration and cannot be considered in the determination of this appeal.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    A condition relating to materials, as set out in the application form, is necessary to ensure the development will assimilate with the host property.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    The material considerations do not indicate that a decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4725No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    13 June 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    21 May 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3341858
Application reference
23/01362/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Planning authority code
E08000031

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
2 April 2024
Valid date
2 April 2024
Start date
18 April 2024
Planning authority decision date
20 March 2024
Appeal decision date
13 June 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
52437
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21