Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3342091

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for the construction of a new clipped hipped roof with a raised ridge incorporating a loft conversion, rear dormer, 5 No rooflights, internal alterations and fenestration changes.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the construction of a new clipped hipped roof with a raised ridge incorporating a loft conversion, rear dormer, 5 No rooflights, internal alterations and fenestration changes at [site address] , Essex, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/01581/FULL, dated 21 December 2023, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, drawings: 3279-S01, S02 [name], S03 [name], L09 and L10.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    I have, in the description of the development above adopted the Council’s wording as this more accurately describes the proposed development and reflects the scheme design illustrated on the drawings, in particular the number of roof lights proposed.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    I consider the main issue to be the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and thereby the street scene.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property, [site address] (No 3) is a detached two-storey house. The area is characterised by a mix of detached and semi-detached two-storey and chalet style dwellings. There is no one style or roof from which is typical of the properties in the drive. Due to the topography of the road No 3 sits slightly higher. It is of a very similar in design to the neighbouring house, No 5 to the north. Nos 1, 3, 5 and 7 have staggered frontages.

    The appellants propose replacing the existing hipped roof with a new raised roof gable roof with half hips. The ridge line of the new roof would be about 0.8 metres higher than the existing. Six new rooflights are proposed to the front roof slope and a new flat roofed box dormer to the rear.

    The Council raise no objection to either the rear dormer or the proposed rooflights. From what I have seen and read I have not formed a contrary view.

    I appreciate that, although set lower on the slope the ridge line of no 3 will be the same as that of no 1. I also accept that the new roof would have a bulkier appearance than that of no 5. However, on balance I do not consider, given the mix of different roof forms in the road, that the proposed increase in roof height and the change in form of the roof would result in an overly large and dominant dwellinghouse such as to cause demonstrable harm to the character and appearance of the existing house or the street scene.

    As a result, the proposal would accord with the objectives of Saved Policy BAS BE12 of the Basildon District Local Plan Saved Policies (September 2007) and the National Planning Policy Framework as they relater to, amongst other things the quality of development and the need to protect both the street scene and the character of the area from material harm.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The conditions follow from those suggested by the Council. To ensure a high quality development, I shall include a condition about the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building.

    In the interests of certainty, I shall impose a condition requiring the development to be undertaken in accordance with the approved plans.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusions

    For the reasons given above and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1184No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    22 July 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    18 June 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3342091
Application reference
23/01581/FULL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Basildon District Council
Planning authority code
E07000066

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
6 April 2024
Valid date
9 April 2024
Start date
10 May 2024
Planning authority decision date
27 February 2024
Appeal decision date
22 July 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
54403
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21