Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3342856

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as ‘outline application for the erection of four dwellings with access from A4117 with all other matters reserved’.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and the outline planning permission Ref 22/0997/OUT for the erection of four dwellings with access from A4117 with all other matters reserved at [site address] , [site address] , [site address] , Kidderminster, Worcestershire, [postcode] , granted on 23 February 2024 by Wyre Forest District Council, is varied by deleting condition No 12.

  2. Section 03

    Background and Main Issue

    An appeal was allowed in March 2022 for this site, granting outline planning permission for the erection of four self or custom build dwellings ([name]/R1845/W/21/3284761). In that decision, the Inspector attributed very limited weight to the 2019 housing needs survey by Rock Parish Council on the basis that housing needs were likely to have changed in the intervening period. Also, that there was a low response rate to the survey. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/24/3342856

    This appeal is also for four houses but without reference to those being self or custom build. It is clear from the Council’s officer report that this proposal was determined on the basis of the houses being open market dwellings. In addition, Condition 13 of the outline permission requires that the development accords with the submitted plans. This includes the proposed development plan which shows a scheme with 2 No. three-bed bungalows, and 2 No. four-bed, two storey houses.

    In that context, the main issue is whether condition 12 is reasonable and necessary in the interests of achieving an acceptable housing development, with particular regard to local housing needs.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Policy DM.2 of the Local Plan supports infill development, subject to certain criteria. Criterion a. is that proposals should meet local needs with reference to parish needs surveys and/or the housing register. As the appeal scheme was submitted on the basis of it being open market dwellings, it is unlikely to be capable of meeting needs on the housing register. No substantive evidence indicates otherwise.

    In any event, following on from the previous appeal scheme, the main parties agree that even if the 2019 Rock Parish Housing Needs Survey indicates that there is no local requirement for a proposal of this nature, limitations in the survey mean its findings attract limited or very limited weight. Moreover, I have not been made aware of plans for it to be updated in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, no alternative evidence has been provided to justify a requirement to consider alternative housing types and tenure.

    In addition, as already noted, the outline application specified the proposed house types and number of bedrooms on the proposed development plan. As these details were not clearly marked as illustrative, the house types and number of bedrooms formed part of the approved details within the outline permission. The Planning Practice Guidance is clear that in such circumstances, conditions cannot be used to reserve those details for subsequent approval ([name]: 21a-005-20190723). As such, a different mix of house types would be in conflict with the approved plans. Furthermore, no robust evidence is before me to indicate that an amendment to condition 13 would be justified.

    Therefore, in the circumstances of this site, I find that it would not be appropriate to require reconsideration of the house types and tenure with reference to the parish housing needs survey or housing register at reserved matters stage. Accordingly, for the reasons given, condition 12 is not reasonable and necessary in the interests of achieving an acceptable housing development, with particular regard to local housing needs.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion

    Accordingly, I conclude that the appeal should succeed. Therefore, I vary the planning permission by deleting the disputed condition. [planning inspector] INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/24/3342856

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 653No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    1 October 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    24 September 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3342856
Application reference
22/0997/OUT
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Wyre Forest District Council
Planning authority code
E07000239

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appeal type reason
4. Grant planning permission for the development subject to conditions to which you object
Appeal reason
Appeal Against Conditions
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0.2921 hectares
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
4
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
19 April 2024
Valid date
19 April 2024
Start date
18 June 2024
Planning authority decision date
23 February 2024
Appeal decision date
1 October 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
57807
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21