Appeal 3342856
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
5 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as ‘outline application for the erection of four dwellings with access from A4117 with all other matters reserved’.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and the outline planning permission Ref 22/0997/OUT for the erection of four dwellings with access from A4117 with all other matters reserved at [site address] , [site address] , [site address] , Kidderminster, Worcestershire, [postcode] , granted on 23 February 2024 by Wyre Forest District Council, is varied by deleting condition No 12.
Section 03
Background and Main Issue
An appeal was allowed in March 2022 for this site, granting outline planning permission for the erection of four self or custom build dwellings ([name]/R1845/W/21/3284761). In that decision, the Inspector attributed very limited weight to the 2019 housing needs survey by Rock Parish Council on the basis that housing needs were likely to have changed in the intervening period. Also, that there was a low response rate to the survey. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/24/3342856
This appeal is also for four houses but without reference to those being self or custom build. It is clear from the Council’s officer report that this proposal was determined on the basis of the houses being open market dwellings. In addition, Condition 13 of the outline permission requires that the development accords with the submitted plans. This includes the proposed development plan which shows a scheme with 2 No. three-bed bungalows, and 2 No. four-bed, two storey houses.
In that context, the main issue is whether condition 12 is reasonable and necessary in the interests of achieving an acceptable housing development, with particular regard to local housing needs.
Section 04
Reasons
Policy DM.2 of the Local Plan supports infill development, subject to certain criteria. Criterion a. is that proposals should meet local needs with reference to parish needs surveys and/or the housing register. As the appeal scheme was submitted on the basis of it being open market dwellings, it is unlikely to be capable of meeting needs on the housing register. No substantive evidence indicates otherwise.
In any event, following on from the previous appeal scheme, the main parties agree that even if the 2019 Rock Parish Housing Needs Survey indicates that there is no local requirement for a proposal of this nature, limitations in the survey mean its findings attract limited or very limited weight. Moreover, I have not been made aware of plans for it to be updated in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, no alternative evidence has been provided to justify a requirement to consider alternative housing types and tenure.
In addition, as already noted, the outline application specified the proposed house types and number of bedrooms on the proposed development plan. As these details were not clearly marked as illustrative, the house types and number of bedrooms formed part of the approved details within the outline permission. The Planning Practice Guidance is clear that in such circumstances, conditions cannot be used to reserve those details for subsequent approval ([name]: 21a-005-20190723). As such, a different mix of house types would be in conflict with the approved plans. Furthermore, no robust evidence is before me to indicate that an amendment to condition 13 would be justified.
Therefore, in the circumstances of this site, I find that it would not be appropriate to require reconsideration of the house types and tenure with reference to the parish housing needs survey or housing register at reserved matters stage. Accordingly, for the reasons given, condition 12 is not reasonable and necessary in the interests of achieving an acceptable housing development, with particular regard to local housing needs.
Section 05
Conclusion
Accordingly, I conclude that the appeal should succeed. Therefore, I vary the planning permission by deleting the disputed condition. [planning inspector] INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate - Appeal Decision APP/R1845/W/24/3342856
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 653No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 1 October 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 24 September 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3342856
- Application reference
- 22/0997/OUT
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Wyre Forest District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000239
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appeal type reason
- 4. Grant planning permission for the development subject to conditions to which you object
- Appeal reason
- Appeal Against Conditions
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Outline
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0.2921 hectares
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 4
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 19 April 2024
- Valid date
- 19 April 2024
- Start date
- 18 June 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Appeal decision date
- 1 October 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 57807
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:28
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21