Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3342891

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

to close in the currently open driveway with yew hedging, and insert electrified hard wood swan neck gates.....placed in the old entrance,..... and then reinstate the garden in front of the garage with flower beds and grass.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted to close in the currently open driveway with yew hedging, and insert electrified hard wood swan neck gates in the old entrance, and then reinstate the garden in front of the garage with flower beds and grass at [site address] , Rockbourne, Hampshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application referenced 23/11053, and subject to the following conditions:-

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the drawings entitled Aerial photo – explanation of works, Block plan, drawing no. 2500-02, and [name].

    Prior to the erection of the gates hereby permitted, details of the gates at a scale of 1:10, including details of the materials, finish, and the spindles, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The gates shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    The description above is taken from the original application, albeit I have omitted the phrases which address the purpose and merits of the development. This description is consistent with the development depicted within the submitted drawings. Consequently, the development as described in the original application has been used in the formal decision.

    [site address] is a grade II listed building within the Rockbourne Conservation Area. As required by Sections 66 and 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (the Act) I have paid special regard to the desirability of preserving a listed building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, and of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of a conservation area.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the use of the proposed access on the safety of users of [address].

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a detached house set back from the public highway behind a large, gravelled parking and turning area. To one side of this thatched roof brick walled cottage is a detached garage and store building. The existing access to the property is to the southern side of the plot, adjacent to that which serves [name].

    The village has an essentially linear form, following the bottom of a valley, and there are numerous historic dwellings fronting the road. The front gardens of many of these houses are defined by hedgerows, as is the case with the appeal property and the neighbouring property to the north. Several of the houses have gated accesses, with a variety of styles of timber and metal gates present throughout the village. The road follows a gently curvaceous route, albeit there are no footways to either side with pedestrians having to walk within the carriageway.

    The proposed gates would be in a similar place to a former vehicular access to the property that is now concealed by the evergreen hedgerow that grows along the front garden boundary. The gates would be set back from the public highway, and when exiting the property users of the access would have similar visibility to the south as occurs with the existing access. Whilst the hedges of the appeal property and those of the neighbouring house would restrict visibility to the north, the existing access also has compromised visibility in this direction not just because of the hedge and curvature of the road, but also due to the presence of the road sign. Speed is restricted to 30mph, and near the village hall the road narrows, and this, along with its curvature would mean that users of the highway would be proceeding cautiously when approaching the cottage. Furthermore, the set back of the gates along with the breadth of the access would combine to make any drivers exiting the property able to see approaching pedestrians and cyclists.

    Within the village the proposed access would be one of numerous private accesses onto the road. Many of the properties nearby have front garden parking and some have accesses with very restricted visibility for drivers. There are also properties where there is no opportunity for vehicles to turn so as to enter and exit in forward gear. As the scheme would benefit from the provision of a turning space to allow drivers to go into and out of the property in forward gear, the relocation of the access would not significantly impact upon the safety of other users of the highway.

    Given my findings, the repositioning of the access would not significantly impact upon the safety of other users of the road. The scheme would be safe to access and easy to navigate, as required by Policy ENV3 of the New Forest District Local Plan Planning Strategy (2020), and would accord with objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) that require development to provide safe and suitable access for all users.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    The cottage is one of several houses within the village that are constructed of thatch and red brick walls. The use of local materials, along with its vernacular form and appearance, are part of the special architectural and historic interest of this listed building. This, and the relationship of the dwelling fronting the public highway is not only part of the significance of the listed building, but is also part of the distinctive character and appearance of the conservation area. Many of the dwellings have front gardens bounded by hedgerows, and this gives a mature, verdant setting to the road and the houses.

    The removal of part of the existing gravelled parking and turning area and the creation of a garden along with the planting of additional hedges, would create a more sympathetic landscaped setting to the listed building. This landscaping would also maintain and enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. The provision of the timber gates would allow views of the front of the house as well as reflecting a characteristic boundary treatment that is found throughout the village. As there are a variety of styles of gates within the village, that proposed would not appear conspicuously different in such a context. For these reasons the scheme would preserve the setting of the listed building and the character and appearance of the conservation area.

    The appeal site lies within the [name] and West Wiltshire Down National Landscape (NL) where there is a statutory duty to protect the landscape and its scenic beauty. As the access would be one of many gated accesses within the village, it would not significantly harm the wider landscape and scenic beauty of the NL as it would be seen as part of the built-up area as a whole.

    Concern has been raised by local residents as regards the depicted boundaries. However, land ownership matters would be for the relevant parties to resolve and have not had a bearing on my assessment of the planning issues in this appeal.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    The conditions suggested by the Council have been considered against paragraph 56 of the Framework. Where necessary and in the interests of clarity and precision they have been altered to better reflect these requirements.

    The standard time condition has been imposed, as has one requiring the development to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans, so as to avoid doubt. The drawings of the gates have been described by the appellant as being for illustration purposes. Having regard to this, I have imposed a condition requiring details of the gates so as to ensure they preserve the setting of the listed building and the character and appearance of the conservation area.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    Thus, for the reasons given above, and having considered all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1303No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    2 August 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    16 July 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3342891
Application reference
23/11053
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
New Forest District Council
Planning authority code
E07000091

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
19 April 2024
Valid date
30 April 2024
Start date
10 June 2024
Planning authority decision date
21 February 2024
Appeal decision date
2 August 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
55046
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21