Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3343744

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a single storey front extension following removal of the current storm porch to form additional habitable accommodation.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey front extension following removal of the current storm porch to form additional habitable accommodation at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/00327/HOU, subject to the following condition[s]:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: WSD/581-001, WSD/581-002, WSD/581- 014, WSD/581-013, WSD/581-012, WSD/581-011, WSD/581-010 and WSD/581-009.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the local area, with reference to the North Fleet Conservation Area (the CA).

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The Appeal dwelling is a substantial detached house in English vernacular style, with rendered elevations and timber windows, with a terracotta tiled roof. The original house has been significantly and sensitively extended in the past and the scale of the dwelling does not lend itself to appearing as a cottage, but rather a house of some status set within a generous garden. There is a driveway leading to a rear parking area and the main entrance to the appeal dwelling, which is the existing storm porch on the rear elevation.

    The appeal dwelling is located on a private road made up of similarly scaled detached houses on generous plots with mature trees. These houses exhibit a variety of architectural expressions, but that appear to mainly reflect an English vernacular, Georgian or arts and crafts influence in their design. There are also generous gaps between houses and set-backs from the road. Collectively this lends itself to a cohesive and verdant street scape.

    The Council have recognised the heritage value of the area through the designation of the CA. The North Fleet Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Proposals Supplementary Planning Document (2008) (the CASPD) sets out the significance of the CA rests mainly in its late 19 th and early 20th Century development as a residential area of large, detached houses on spacious plots with mature trees and a sylvan quality. As such, the appeal dwelling contributes to this significance.

    In line with the duty imposed on me by section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, I have given considerable importance and weight to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Conservation Area.

    The existing storm porch on the rear elevation of the appeal dwelling is the main entrance to the appeal dwelling. This is a small porch, which, although it belies the scale of the appeal dwelling, does reflect, in in its simplicity, the English vernacular style of the appeal dwelling house. However, the understated storm porch does not read as a main entrance to a house of this scale, rather it reads as a secondary entrance.

    As such, there is not currently an entrance that reflects the scale of the appeal dwelling, or appears to reflect in its design, the status and visual announcement of main entrances found in original English vernacular houses of scale. Being at the rear of the property and given the scale of surrounding properties, the porch is little overlooked from outside the appeal plot.

    The proposal would replace the existing storm porch with a larger single storey extension. Similar to the existing storm porch this would be centrally positioned on the original and main element of the house, reflecting in its position and design the fenestration of the appeal dwelling. The roof of the proposal would be flat, with a low fully glazed roof light to its centre, with a decorative metalwork frieze that would engage with the existing string course on the rear elevation of the appeal dwelling. Otherwise, the render, brick work and window materials proposed would match that of the existing building.

    However, the proposed architectural expression would also add decorative detailing and features that would announce the entrance as being the main entrance to that of a house of scale. The design chosen appears to draw on traditional English architectural exemplars, particularly where later additions were added to late medieval hall houses or larger farmhouses to create houses of status. As such, the proposal appears to be in keeping with the English architecture exemplars of the local area and that of the appeal dwelling and would not, therefore, appear as overly ostentatious and would complement the architectural design of the appeal dwelling.

    The proposal would only appear in limited views afforded of the rear of the appeal dwelling, but in these views would appear as a subordinate and contextually appropriate addition to the appeal dwelling. As such, the proposal would not detract from the contribution that the appeal dwelling and the local streetscape make to the significance of the CA.

    Whilst the Council has raised concerns that, should the proposal be allowed, it could set a precedent that could result in proposals for other damaging additions and alterations to other properties in the local area, I have considered the proposal on its own merits, which is a key tenet of the planning system. I have not therefore accorded this any significant weight in my considerations.

    For the reasons given above, I find that the proposal would not result in any significant harm to the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and would preserve the character and appearance of the CA. As such the proposal would accord with saved Policy GEN1 of the Hart Local Plan (2006), Policy NBE8 and Policy NBE9 of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032 (2020) and Section 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023). These collectively seek development, including extensions, that achieve a high quality of design, contribute to the overall appearance of the local area and conserve or enhance heritage assets.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    Along with the standard condition for the time limit on implementation of the development, in the interests of design quality I have included conditions requiring compliance with approved plans and the use of matching materials to existing.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    The appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 209No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    8 August 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    17 July 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3343744
Application reference
24/00327/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Hart District Council
Planning authority code
E07000089

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
10 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
3 May 2024
Valid date
3 May 2024
Start date
23 May 2024
Planning authority decision date
15 April 2024
Appeal decision date
8 August 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
55325
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21