Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3344332

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is allowed for replacement windows from timber to UPVC as per application reference NE/24/00148/FUL dated 11 February 2024 subject to the conditions as set out in the Schedule below.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    The description in the heading above differs from that used by the Appellant in their original application form and is the one used by the Council in their determination of this appeal which I consider better reflects the nature of development proposed. As such I have used this description accordingly.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues are the effect of the proposal upon the significance of the Collyweston Conservation Area and the setting and significance of nearby Listed Buildings.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property appears to be a converted cottage and outbuilding of generally vernacular design and materials arranged around a partial U shaped, inner court. The proposal before me is to replace all the existing timber windows within the property and replace them with ‘Residence 9’ UPVC flush casement windows.

    The property has seen obvious alteration and conversion over recent years and this includes the historic replacement, and possibly, later insertion of new window openings. As a result, the existing windows are modern and do not contain either historic timber frames nor historic glass. The windows are therefore simple casements of quite a robust and thick design. Despite this I Appeal Decision Appeal Ref: APP/M2840/D/24/3344332 saw that the windows were in generally good repair apart from one sill that was suffering from rot.

    The appeal property is located within the adopted Collyweston Conservation Area and is located upon a plot that is adjacent to the site of the Grade II Listed ‘The Tithe Barn’. The site is also adjacent to a Scheduled Monument known as ‘[address]’. Collyweston Conservation Area is wholly covered by an Article 4 Direction that removes certain Permitted Development Rights from non listed buildings within the area and this includes the replacement of windows.

    The significance of the Collyweston Conservation Area is largely due to its survival as a village of considerable vernacular and historic character that epitomises the historic character of this part of Northamptonshire. Similarly, it appears that the significance of the nearby Grade II Listed ‘The Tithe Barn’ is largely obtained through both its vernacular architecture dating from the 16th century as well as its association with the former [name] which was the home of [name].

    As a result of the sensitive heritage setting that the property is part of I am required by Sections 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to have special regard to the desirability of preserving a listed building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. Similarly, Section 72 of the same Act requires me to show special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the Collyweston Conservation Area when determining planning applications for development within such an area. The National Planning Policy Framework (The Framework) also states that when considering the impact of proposed development on the significance of the heritage asset, ‘great weight’ should be given to the asset’s conservation.

    In assessing this appeal therefore, it is important to understand the significance of the existing windows. As mentioned above, the existing windows do not contain historic frames nor historic glass which I consider would be very important to preserve within the context of the Conservation Area. As a result, the existing frames are relatively modern in appearance and lack the finesse of detail or slender proportions that is often present in older examples of fenestration within the village.

    As such I consider that the significance of the windows is mainly due to the material that they are made of and little else. This material however is obscured by paintwork and as such appears like a smooth, modern window which lacks any sense of historical authenticity. [name] windows may not last as long as traditional timber windows and are not repairable, the windows would, for the most part be located within the private areas of the appeal site and would not be visible from the streetscene or surrounding areas.

    As a result there would be little actual noticeable effect from this proposal other than the three small windows fronting to [name] which would be replacing existing modern window designs. As a result any impact to the conservation area and the setting of the ‘The Tithe Barn’ would actually be negligible.

    As such, I do not find harm to the historic environment through this proposal and consider that the character and appearance of the Collyweston Appeal Decision Appeal Ref: APP/M2840/D/24/3344332 Conservation Area would be preserved. Accordingly, the requirements within Policy EN12 of the East Northamptonshire Local Plan Part 2 (2023) and Policy 8(d) of the [name] (2016) would be met.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The Council includes the standard conditions of which I have included. This is related to the scheme being in accordance with the approved plans. I have not included the condition regarding materials as this is unnecessary. I have also altered the time limit for works to commence due to the existing windows still seemingly being in generally good repair. As such, in the interests of minimising unnecessary waste, I have requested that work is begun not later than eight years as opposed to three years as suggested by the Council.

    It is also necessary to include a condition requiring details of the insertion of the proposed windows into the building showing details around window reveals and cills which have not previously been included. This is to further preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and to ensure that the detailed execution and installation does not cause any harm to the area.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, and taking into account of all other matters raised, I allow the appeal subject to the conditions as outlined in the Schedule below.

  7. Section 08

    SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than eight years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Joinery details 25/02/24, Joinery details 25/02/24, Location plan 001 25/02/24, Proposed floor plans 301A 25/02/24, Location plan 25/02/24, Proposed site plan 27/02/24, Existing site plan 27/02/24.

    Prior to the commencement of development details of proposed window cills, proposed window reveals and window and joinery fixings will be provided and shown at an appropriate scale and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted decision date · page 1
    15 October 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    13 September 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3344332
Application reference
NE/24/00148/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
North Northamptonshire
Planning authority code
Not recorded

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
14 May 2024
Valid date
14 May 2024
Start date
17 June 2024
Planning authority decision date
30 April 2024
Appeal decision date
15 October 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
58471
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21