Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3346165

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a flat roof dormer with rear facing windows to be replaced with non-flat roof dormer with rear-facing windows, extend the side garage roof forward to create a front carport, replacing the flat roofs.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a flat roof dormer with rear facing windows to be replaced with non-flat roof dormer with rear-facing windows, extend the side garage roof forward to create a front carport, replacing the flat roofs at [site address] , [site address] , Cambridgeshire in accordance with the terms of the application, reference 24/00653/HFUL, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: JPT/TB/0821/001 [name] and 002 [name].

    The works hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the description of materials set out in the application form.

    Any trees and shrubs along the front boundary which, within a period of five years from the completion of the development or the occupation of the buildings, whichever is the sooner, die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the area. Appeal Decision: APP/W0530/D/24/3346165

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The proposal would result in a number of alterations to the house but the council acknowledge that the development would be very similar to the previously approved scheme (reference 23/00046/HFUL), with the only difference being that the carport would extend forward by an additional 1.5m. The council’s concern therefore only relates to the front projecting carport.

    The council have already accepted a substantial addition to the front of this property. The front garden area is well screened by vegetation and at a lower level than the road. Although screening of this area, currently used for parking and turning, would be reduced during the winter months, the marginal difference between this proposal and that already accepted by the council, would not be clearly discernible from the street. Although reference has been made to the wider building line along this road, it is not entirely consistent. This minor change to what the council has already accepted would not materially alter the character or appearance of this area. Although the council refers to the proposed design within the reason for refusal, it has already accepted the general form and detailing of the structure proposed.

    The previous permission was considered against policy HQ/1 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2018 and was found, by the council, to be acceptable. The policy remains in force and the difference in the proposals is not sufficient to suggest that an alternative view could be justified. I therefore allow the appeal.

    I have imposed conditions relating to the commencement of development and the details of the approved plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. I have also repeated the conditions of the previous permission with regard to materials and landscaping to ensure that the proposal would have a satisfactory appearance.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 341No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    5 September 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    20 August 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3346165
Application reference
24/00653/HFUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Planning authority code
E07000012

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
12 June 2024
Valid date
12 June 2024
Start date
4 July 2024
Planning authority decision date
8 April 2024
Appeal decision date
5 September 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
56654
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21