Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3346198

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

3 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for part single/two storey side and rear extensions at [site address] , Dagenham, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application ref 24/00149/HSE, dated 1 February 2024, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    the development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: BP01, LP01, 001, 002, 003A & 004A.

  2. Section 03

    Reasons

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

    The appeal property is a semi-detached house that lies on a corner site of Central Park Avenue, [address] North and [address]. This corner location leads to a tapered plot to the house, with a notable degree of space between the front elevation of the house and the neighbour of [address] North, with that spacing reducing further into the site. That adjoining house of No. [address] to the mutual plot boundary deeper into the site.

    The proposed extension would fill the plot width at ground floor and be set back from the front elevation, with an angled form to reflect the tapered site. At first floor the extension would be kept away from the boundary with a staggered form, and that stepped design means the extension would also be www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate set back from the front elevation of the house. The ridge line of the extension would be lower than the main house.

    These design features combine to create a well-balanced and proportionate extension to the house, and the pair of semi-detached properties. The scale and form of the extensions would be clear later additions to the house, with the set-back and stepped design of the first floor assisting in minimising any visual intrusion. The well-considered design of the proposed extension would retain a good degree of separation to the neighbour at first floor. This would ensure no terracing effect with that property or undue imposition into any spacious character of the wider area.

    Although the overall floorspace of the extension is large in comparison with the existing house, the design is of high quality that effectively ensures that extension would appear subordinate to the original house and thus not overwhelm the house or the plot. The character of the street scene would be retained, with the extensions, porch and alterations to the front elevation fitting comfortably within the mixed character of the area, which has seen a number of properties altered and extended.

    The proposals are therefore consistent with the policies of the development plan that seek a high quality of design which protects or enhances the character of the area, as set out in Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, and Policies DMD1 and DMD5 of the [site address] Local Plan 2024. Similar guidance is contained in the [name] and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2012.

    Planning permission is granted, and I attach the Council’s suggested conditions relating to materials and specifying the approved plans, to ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and in the interests of precision.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 97No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    19 December 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    19 November 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3346198
Application reference
24/00149/HSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Planning authority code
E09000002

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
47 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
12 June 2024
Valid date
12 June 2024
Start date
19 July 2024
Planning authority decision date
28 March 2024
Appeal decision date
19 December 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
61983
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21