Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3347500

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a two storey side and single storey rear extensions with internal alterations.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a two storey side and single storey rear extensions with internal alterations at [site address] , Blurton, [site address] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 70663, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with approved plans: Block and Location Plan, and JPK/23/5097/3 [name].

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    This is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Located on the corner of [address] and [address], the property is a 2 storey semi-detached house. The property, and its adjoining pair, face the corner at a 45° angle, with dwellings on the south side of [address] and north of the property fronting directly onto the respective roads. The opposite corner of [address] contains another pair of corner facing semi-detached houses. The area is residential and suburban, with properties generally constructed from brick under hipped tiled roofs.

    The proposal is for a 2 storey side extension and single storey rear extension. The 2 storey extension will project to the side, parallel with the front wall, before returning on an angle to meet the front building line of [address]. The rear extension will wrap around the back of the house, projecting around 2.3m from the rear wall.

    Whilst the location on the corner is more prominent than other front facing dwellings, the design and layout of the 2 storey extension would respect the building lines and address both street frontages. It would be significantly set back from the front elevation, and coupled with the particularly subservient ridge height, would not be overbearing in the street scene.

    Thus, the scale and massing would be appropriate and sympathetic, and this would not adversely affect the pattern of development. This is because the design of the proposal, even if an unconventional shape, would still enable the property to be read as a corner plot, with the front elevation remaining the focal point. It would be an effective use of land and would contribute positively to the character of the existing house and the wider area overall.

    Therefore, the proposal would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area. This would comply with Policy CSP1 of the Newcastle-under-Lyme and [site address] [name] 2006-2026 (October 2009), which seeks to ensure new development is well designed, contributing positively to an areas identity in terms of scale, density and layout. There would also be compliance with the Newcastle-under-Lyme and [site address] Urban Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (December 2010), which seeks to guide well designed residential extensions, and the National Planning Policy Framework, which seeks to achieve well designed and beautiful places.

  4. Section 05

    Other matters

    Concerns are raised that the proposal could result in loss of light and privacy. There are no windows proposed in the side elevation, and rear facing windows would overlook the rear garden of the appeal property. There may be a small reduction in direct afternoon or evening sunlight to the side elevation of [address], depending on the time of year. However, this would not result in unacceptably adverse living conditions for the occupiers of No 4 given daylight would still be able to pass through.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The plans are listed for certainty, and it would be necessary for the materials to match to ensure a suitable external appearance.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons set out above, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1055No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    13 September 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 September 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3347500
Application reference
70663
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Planning authority code
E06000021

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
4 July 2024
Valid date
4 July 2024
Start date
24 July 2024
Planning authority decision date
26 April 2024
Appeal decision date
13 September 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
57071
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21