Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3349990

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as ‘Erection of single storey side/rear extension. Fenestration change to anthracite grey aluminium frames on existing house and to porch entrance. Application of smooth render to all external walls.’

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for erection of a single storey side/rear extension; fenestration change to anthracite grey aluminium frames on existing house and to porch entrance, and application of smooth render to all external walls at [site address] , Tolworth, [name] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/01163/HOU, subject to the conditions set out in the schedule below.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupants of no.[address], with particular regard to outlook.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The northern side of [address] comprises predominantly two storey semi detached properties with a slightly staggered building line and the ground levels fall gently from west to east. No.161 adjoins the appeal site to the south west. It has a single storey side extension which runs along the boundary with no.163 and has a window in its rear elevation close to the boundary. Although there is not evidence before me to suggest the use of the room which that window serves, I have no strong reason to believe that it does not serve a habitable room, and contributes to the outlook enjoyed by its occupants. That window has outlook over the rear garden of no.161 and is enclosed to the east by the existing closeboard timber fence which runs between the two properties. There is also a change in ground level either side of the boundary, which the appellant reports to be approximately 40cm lower on the side of no.163.

    The proposed extension would project alongside the boundary with no.161 and beyond its rear elevation. It would have an eaves level of 2.45m and a relatively shallow pitched roof which would slope away from the shared boundary. As such, part of the new flank wall and roof of the proposed extension would be likely to be visible from the nearest window of no.161 and it would enclose the eastern side of part of its garden. However, given the height of the proposal against the boundary, taken together with the effects of the existing boundary treatment and change in ground levels, its effect on the outlook from no.161 would not be overbearing.

    Overall, the proposal would not cause harm to the living conditions of occupants of no.161 in terms of outlook. The proposal would comply with Policy DM10 of the Council’s Core Strategy 2012 which requires, among other things, that developments have regard to the amenities of occupants and neighbours, including in terms of outlook, and with Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 insofar as it requires appropriate outlook, privacy and amenity.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    The proposal includes other alterations to the property to which the Council have raised no objection. This would include rendering over the existing brickwork at the front ground floor level which is a traditional characteristic of the street and matches the attached property. Nonetheless, having regard to the character and appearance of the street more generally, which includes a number of alterations and extensions to properties, overall the other alterations proposed are acceptable.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The Council have set out conditions which it considers would be appropriate in the event that the appeal were allowed. I have considered these in light of the advice in the Planning Practice Guidance. In addition to the standard time limit condition, a condition is necessary to list the approved drawings to provide certainty to the parties. Given the provisions of London Plan Policy D12 and given the fire statement submitted with the appeal is in draft, a condition is necessary to secure details of final fire safety provisions. As materials are annotated on the approved plans it is not necessary to condition them further.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    The proposal would comply with the development plan and the appeal is allowed.

  7. Section 08

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos: ‘Location Plan’, P.M.400 Rev.A, P.M.500 Rev.A, and P.M.600 Rev.A.

    Prior to the commencement of development above the damp-proof course of the extension hereby approved, a [name] shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. This shall include details of: - suitably positioned unobstructed outside space for fire appliances to be positioned on, and appropriate for use as an evacuation assembly point; - appropriate features which reduce the risk to life and risk of serious injury in the vent of a fire including fire alarm systems and passive and active fire safety measures; - construction means to minimise risk of fire spread - suitable and convenient means of escape, and associated evacuation strategy for all building users and a strategy for evacuation; - suitable access and equipment for firefighting which is appropriate to the development hereby approved. Those details shall have regard to the relevant London Plan Fire Safety Guidance and the development shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with those approved details. End of Schedule

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 494No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    23 January 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    21 January 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3349990
Application reference
24/01163/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Planning authority code
E09000021

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
13 August 2024
Valid date
13 August 2024
Start date
16 September 2024
Planning authority decision date
12 July 2024
Appeal decision date
23 January 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
63370
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21