Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3350344

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the proposed extension of the existing rear first floor balcony.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the proposed extension of the existing rear first floor balcony at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application reference 241050, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Existing and proposed plans and elevations, location and layout plan – [name] 01

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing balcony.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issues are the effect of the proposal on a) the character and appearance of the host building and local area; and b) the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring residences in respect of overlooking.

  3. Section 04

    Character and appearance

    The appeal site comprises a two-storey, detached dwelling with off-street parking on a driveway to the front. It is located in a cul-de-sac of other residential properties.

    The appeal property includes an existing first floor balcony that looks out over the rear garden and countryside beyond. It is of diminutive scale, with very limited views of the development from the public domain or the amenity spaces of surrounding residences, primarily [address]. _________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________

    Whilst the proposal would enlarge the balcony, to all intents and purposes only the south-facing privacy screen would become more immediately evident from the garden of [address]. Nonetheless, the extent of this screen would be modest, and an adequate separation distance between the houses would remain.

    From further afield, the glazed appearance of the balcony would not appear overly prominent or discordant, being set against the backdrop of the built form of the main dwelling. I am therefore satisfied that it would assimilate with the house and its setting.

    Consequently, I conclude that the scheme would not result in a detrimental impact upon the character and appearance of the host building and local area. It would comply with Policies DM13 and DM15 of the Colchester Borough Local Plan 2022 (LP), which seek to secure development of an acceptable scale and design. It would also be consistent with the advice in the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), which states that good design is a key aspect of sustainable development.

  4. Section 05

    Living conditions

    The position of the proposed balcony relative to no.[address] would allow for the overlooking of the rear garden of this neighbouring property. However, the inclusion of appropriately-placed obscure glazed screens would provide privacy for both users of the balconies and neighbouring occupiers.

    The development would create views over the very end of the long rear gardens belonging to dwellings on [address], still such areas are less sensitively located than, for example, patios immediately to the rear of habitable rooms. To my mind, the impact would not be so harmful as to warrant a refusal of permission on this ground. There would also be direct overlooking of the agricultural land to the east, however this is not residential amenity space and as such I afford any concerns limited weight.

    I find that there would be no adverse effect upon the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring residences in respect of overlooking. The scheme would meet Policies DM13 and DM15 of the LP and the Framework in relation to the protection of amenity.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of advice in Planning Policy Guidance and the National Planning Policy Framework. In addition to the standard implementation condition, the approved plans are listed for certainty. A condition requiring external materials to match those on the existing balcony would provide for a satisfactory appearance.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    Given the above arguments and all other issues, I allow the appeal.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 212No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    8 January 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    18 December 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3350344
Application reference
241050
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Colchester Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000071

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
19 August 2024
Valid date
19 August 2024
Start date
16 September 2024
Planning authority decision date
17 July 2024
Appeal decision date
8 January 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
62554
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21