Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3350752

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

single storey side extension to form new garage. Removal of garden wall and new dropped kerb.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for single storey side extension to form new garage. Removal of garden wall and new dropped kerb at [site address] , [name] [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/01322/HOU, and subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is whether the proposed access would be acceptable with regard to highway safety.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is in a residential area where houses are typically accessed from driveways to the front of the property, requiring vehicles to cross over the pavement. In some instances, these accesses are close to junctions with other residential roads. For example, the vehicular access to [address] to the junction with [address]. However, given the relatively tightknit nature of the residential roads, and the presence of some on-street car parking, vehicle speeds are likely to be reasonably low. Moreover, no substantive evidence is before me to indicate that highway safety at such junctions has been an issue in the locality.

    In addition, the frequency of vehicles coming in and out of the appeal site is likely to be low. This further limits the potential for highway safety concerns and opportunities for the proposed access to cause confusion. Although the appeal site has vehicular parking at the rear of the site, the proposal would provide more convenient access from the front of the site. Moreover, I am not persuaded that closure of the rear parking area would be necessary in order to justify allowing the appeal in the circumstances of this case.

    Therefore, the proposed access would be acceptable with regard to highway safety. It therefore accords with Policy CT2 of the Milton Keynes Council Plan:MK 2016-2031 (March 2019). Amongst other matters this seeks to ensure proposals provide safe access. It would also comply with Policy CT10 of Plan:MK which includes a requirement for development to meet the Council’s parking standards.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, conditions are imposed to require that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plan and using materials that match the existing building. This is in the interests of certainty and proper planning. A condition is also imposed to require the submission of details of the dropped kerb/crossover in the interests of highway safety.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given, the appeal is allowed.

  6. Section 07

    Schedule of conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing no PL01 [name].

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    Prior to the first use of the vehicular access hereby permitted, details of the dropped kerb/crossover shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The works shall be undertaken in accordance with the approved details prior to the first use of the access by vehicles and shall thereafter be retained as such.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 653No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    1 May 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 April 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3350752
Application reference
24/01322/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Milton Keynes Council
Planning authority code
E06000042

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
27 August 2024
Valid date
29 August 2024
Start date
8 October 2024
Planning authority decision date
9 August 2024
Appeal decision date
1 May 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
68780
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21