Appeal 3351002
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the formation of vehicular access on to B261 and provision of one off-street parking space in front garden with associated hard standing at [site address] , Gravesend [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application reference 20240534, subject to the following conditions.
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 01, 03, 04A.
The landscaping and planting shown on drawing no. 03 shall be carried out in full during the first available planting season following the installation of the scheme hereby approved. Any trees or plants that die, are damaged, removed or become diseased within five years from the date that the soft landscaping scheme is implemented shall be replaced with a species of a similar size and species during the next available planting season.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue in the consideration of this appeal is the impact of the development on highway safety.
Section 04
Reasons
The appeal site is a semi-detached house on [address] West, a class 'B' road that runs in the direction of Northfleet town centre. The residence lies within a row of properties of similar size and appearance between the junctions with [address] and [address]. _________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________
At my site visit I saw myriad hardscaped frontages are evident in the street scene, creating off-street parking spaces for the houses along both sides of [address] West; the proposal introduces a similar arrangement with vehicular access and hardstanding to the front of the appeal site.
Vehicular manoeuvres across the public footpaths into and out of local accesses are a common feature along [address] West, although these are approached with caution. The Council states that appropriate sight lines would not be achieved at the site entrance. I recognise that a vehicle emerging from the driveway, with the driver having restricted views of other road users, is an obvious safety threat.
However, that prospect would be little different to the existing accesses to numerous properties elsewhere along [address] West. Due to the infrequency and short duration of such manoeuvres and the low speeds involved, I find that highway safety would not be unduly compromised in this particular instance. Furthermore, I note that the Local Highways Department does not object to the scheme, and whilst the Council has highlighted two accidents in the 5 year period 2018 to 2022, there is no indication whether these were as a result of vehicles entering or exiting driveways.
I have read the appeal decision referred to by the Authority (Inspectorate reference APP/K2230/D/23/3329520), which relates to a crossover elsewhere in the environs of Gravesend. I note that this would have involved a vehicle having to negotiate a well-used layby to reach the main highway, and that there is “continuity to the garden frontages along this stretch of [address]”, which would imply that there are no other accesses to houses within the area, both of which are not the case in this instance. I therefore consider that the cited appeal is not comparable to that before me.
I conclude that the development would not have a detrimental impact on highway safety. It would comply with Policies CS11 and CS19 of the Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy 2014, Policy T5 of the Local Plan First Review (1994)and the [name]/Alterations Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2021.
Section 05
Conditions
I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of advice in Planning Policy Guidance and the Framework. In addition to the standard implementation condition, the approved plans are listed for certainty. A condition requiring the completion of the landscaping scheme is necessary to ensure that the proposal integrates with the site and surrounding area and provides for biodiversity.
Section 06
Conclusion
In respect of the foregoing and all other factors, I allow the appeal.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 212No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 12 November 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 31 October 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3351002
- Application reference
- 20240534
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Gravesham Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000109
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 30 August 2024
- Valid date
- 30 August 2024
- Start date
- 20 September 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Appeal decision date
- 12 November 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Yes
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 59897
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:28
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21