Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3351112

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a part two/part single storey extension, first floor extension to the side and new garage to the side.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a part two/part single storey extension, first floor extension to the side and new garage to the side at [site address] , in accordance with the terms of the application, reference 24H/1394, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 001–A, 020–C and 030–J.

    The works hereby permitted shall be carried out in materials that match those of the existing dwelling.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issues are the effect on the character and appearance of the area; and the effect on the living conditions of the residents of [address] with regard to outlook.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The works would result in a continuation of the existing ridge and eaves to the side of the property and the addition of a narrow two storey front extension. There would also be a narrow additional ground floor front extension and an attached garage to the side.

    The first floor side extension would not represent a subordinate addition to the property but as a continuation of the existing; and with the subordinate new front gable and side garage, it would not appear overbearing when viewed from the street. In combination, the final composition would result in a considerable www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate Appeal Decision: APP/Z4310/D/24/3351112 improvement to the appearance of the property, with each individual element being respectful of the proportions of the extended dwelling overall.

    The additions would substantially increase the overall scale of the dwelling but would add interest to its appearance. The proposal would therefore enhance rather than detract from the character or appearance of the area. There would be no conflict with policies H8 or UD1 of the Liverpool Local Plan 2013-2033 (2022)(LP) as the extensions would represent a high quality of design and would complement and be in keeping with the original dwelling and the surrounding area.

    The proposed garage would be located close to the side boundary of the neighbouring property. As that property is set well forward, the garage would be adjacent to its rear garden. It would be set a significant distance from the living accommodation within the neighbouring house and as a result, the rear windows would retain a generally open aspect. It would result in development above the height of the dividing fence which would increase the prominence of development when in the adjacent rear garden. This would only result in a minor increase in shading in the early mornings and because of its position and low pitched roof, it would not be overbearing when in the adjacent garden. It would not therefore result in a significant enclosure of the neighbouring property or unacceptably harm the living conditions of the residents of [address] with regard to outlook.

    As the extensions have been designed so that there would be no significant reduction in the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties, there would be no conflict with the amenity requirements of LP policies H7 and H8. The proposal would also gain general support from the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 as this seeks development that functions well and adds to the overall quality of the area.

    Reference has been made to Supplementary Planning Guidance Note 1: [name]. I am not clear of the status of this document but in any event, as its purpose it to protect the amenity of adjacent occupiers and to ensure that proposals do not detract from the character of residential areas, the development would not conflict with its aspirations.

    In conclusion, as there are no matters that weigh significantly against the proposal, I allow the appeal.

    I have imposed conditions relating to the commencement of development and the details of the approved plans for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. The application form sets out that the materials to be used would match the existing and a condition would require this to ensure that the development would have a satisfactory appearance.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 341No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    6 November 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    25 October 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3351112
Application reference
24H/1394
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Liverpool City Council
Planning authority code
E08000012

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
2 September 2024
Valid date
11 September 2024
Start date
7 October 2024
Planning authority decision date
22 July 2024
Appeal decision date
6 November 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
59599
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21