Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3351205

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

replacement boundary walls, gates and railings

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for replacement boundary walls, gates and railings at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/1394/24 subject to the following conditions: -

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans; 2322-100.15, 2322-200.15, 2322-200.15 [name], 2342- 500.15 and 2342-600.15.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property forms part of a linear row of properties to the eastern side of [site address] , with open countryside to the other side which is part of Epping Forest. It occupies a corner position wrapping along [address] which is on a gradient with the rear of the property on higher ground.

    The rear section of the side boundary is currently formed of close-boarded fencing, and at the time of my site visit, the rest of the boundary was comprised of temporary hoarding with work taking place on the dwelling. The previous low-level wall has been removed.

    The style of properties along [site address] varies, and many have been altered and extended, creating large, detached houses. Set back from the road there is variation to the form of the front boundaries. Whilst the Council indicate the area has an open plan layout, and the neighbouring properties immediately to the northeast do have open frontages, there are numerous properties which have more defined boundary treatments and visual enclosure. This includes some high close-boarded fences and other solid structures, although generally, a level of openness and greenery is maintained with railings on top of walls of a modest height with hedging behind, providing a sense of space and contributing to the verdant character of the area.

    The proposed solid boundary wall would have a low height between the piers, with the upper section comprising wrought iron railings. The brickwork would match the property, and similar treatments are found on the corners of [site address] with [address] and [name] respectively. Thereby, while creating a continuous length of enclosure to the property, there would be cohesion and consistency to the boundary, and I do not find that it would be an overly intrusive feature.

    There is a transition taking place to the properties along [site address] , and with the alterations, there appears to be greater height and definition to the boundaries. With an overall height of approximately 1.5m, the proposed treatment would be lower than some other boundaries found in the locality, and it would reflect what is a prevalent form with a level of visual openness retained and the potential for planting within the garden.

    Therefore, I find that the development would harmonize with the character and appearance of the area and accord with the provisions of policy DM9 of the Epping Forest Local Plan 2023, which seeks a high-quality design that respects the property and its setting.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    As part of my considerations, I have had regard to the representations of Loughton Town Council. Visibility splays and access points have been shown on the plans, and the Council, advised by [name], have found the arrangements acceptable, and I have no reason to disagree.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    I therefore conclude that the appeal should be allowed, subject to conditions to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements relating to the commencement of development and the plans for certainty.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 362No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    29 January 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    8 January 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3351205
Application reference
EPF/1394/24
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Epping Forest District Council
Planning authority code
E07000072

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
0 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
3 September 2024
Valid date
3 September 2024
Start date
26 September 2024
Planning authority decision date
30 August 2024
Appeal decision date
29 January 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
63700
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21