Appeal 3353941
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the raising of the ridge to add an additional floor, part first floor, part two storey rear extension, single storey side extension and front porch.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the raising of the ridge to add an additional floor, part first floor, part two storey rear extension, single storey side extension and front porch at [site address] , [address], [site address] , Devon [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/00965/HOU, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall, other than where otherwise specified on the approved plans, match those used in the existing building.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 24.004.BP.01; 24.004.PL.01; 24.004.PL.02; 24.004.PL.03 & 24.004.SLP.01 [name].
Prior to first use/occupation of the development hereby approved, the biodiversity enhancement measures set out in the approved ecology report by [name] dated 7th May 2024 shall be implemented in accordance with the details sets out in the report. For the sake of clarity, the measures shall include: 2 x crevice bat boxes installed on the eastern gable end near the new extension, 2 x crevice bat boxes installed under the eaves on the south elevation of the new extension, 2 x sparrow terraces installed behind cladding / under the eaves on the north elevation of the new extension.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality.
Section 04
Character and appearance
The appeal property is a detached dwelling in a large, irregularly shaped plot in a reasonably isolated location, away from the main part of the nearest settlement. The dwelling is one of four in this location; the site of a farmyard complex. It is previously converted from a barn and is the farmhouse for [address]. The area is of established rural character and the locality’s appearance is pleasing if not remarkable. The proposal is as described above.
The Council is concerned that the size and massing of the scheme, particularly at first floor level, is such that the addition would not respect the scale or proportions of the current building and thus would be aesthetically harmful.
For my part I noted an array of large local structures; residential, farm buildings and electricity pylons, and I would not rule out the principle of additional massing of built form in this location. I would assess that the plot size here could suitably absorb a greater scale of building as could the wider landscape in this relatively discrete location. The chosen design would appear to me to reasonably draw upon cues from the existing structure and a degree of subservience would continue. I find the selection of materials and finishes would be suitable and fenestration would be appropriate for this setting.
In summary, whilst this addition would be sizeable it would be comfortably accommodated both visually and in character terms as a new part of the existing dwelling and as an element within the wider environs.
Policies S2 and WE8 of the Teignbridge Local Plan 2013-2033, along with Policy H11 of the Teignbridge Submission Local Plan 2020-2040, taken together and amongst other matters, call for householder development to be of good design quality suited to a site and its wider context with a form which has appropriate scale and which safeguards the character and appearance of a locality. I conclude that the appeal scheme would not run contrary to these policies.
Section 05
Conditions
Along with standard commencement the Council suggests conditions requiring development to be in matching materials and in accordance with listed, approved, plans. I would agree with this in the interests of visual amenity and for the avoidance of doubt. I also agree that the Council’s suggestion of an ecology related condition would be appropriate in the interests of biodiversity enhancement.
Section 06
Overall conclusion
For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal proposal would not have unacceptable adverse effects on the character and appearance of the host property or the locality. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 352No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 10 December 2024Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 11 November 2024 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3353941
- Application reference
- 24/00965/HOU
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Teignbridge District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000045
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Yes
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 17 October 2024
- Valid date
- 17 October 2024
- Start date
- 29 October 2024
- Planning authority decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Appeal decision date
- 10 December 2024
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 61575
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:28
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21