Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3354025

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of a pergola car port.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for the erection of a pergola car port at [site address] in accordance with the terms of planning application ref: APP/24/00705/F dated 21 June 2024, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Existing and [name] - [name]: FP.02 - received 21/06/24; Existing Block Plan and [name] - [name]: BP.01 revision A - received 25/06/24; [name] and Elevations - [name]: FP.01 - received 21/06/24; Proposed Block Plan - [name]: BP.02 - received 21/06/24.

    The pergola car port hereby approved shall be constructed in accordance with the finishing materials and colour finish as stated on the application form and as shown on the approved plans.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issues in the appeal are the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and streetscene and the effect on the living conditions of the occupants of [site address] in relation to light.

  3. Section 04

    Character and appearance

    The site is situated on the north eastern side of [address] near to the junction with [address] and comprises a one and a half storey rendered detached dwelling with a vehicular hardstanding, a small grey slate boundary wall and low electronic gate in front of the dwelling. It has a pitched roof form with a broadly gable shape facing the road. It is located within the settlement boundary of Poole.

    Existing vehicular and pedestrian access is obtained from [address] and there is a public right of way which runs in a broadly east direction along the south side of the appeal site between it and no.[address].

    The character of the immediate area bordering the site is residential, with dwellings of mixed designs and ages.

    The proposed development is for a pergola-style car port constructed of anthracite grey aluminium. The structure would measure about 3.8m in width and about 6.25m in length with a height of about 2.4m. It would have no sides. It would be sited in the parking area at the front of the dwelling and it would abut the front elevation and skirt part of the south-eastern boundary.

    Whilst the appeal site itself is prominent when travelling from a south-west direction, the car port would be a modestly-sized lightweight structure which would be seen, for the most part, against the rendered front façade of the dwelling. This factor coupled with its open nature would result in a reasonably unobtrusive structure, sympathetic to the host dwelling but also sympathetic to the mixed character of the streetscene. In addition, no. [site address] is a contemporary style of dwelling and the proposal with its anthracite aluminium frame would be both complimentary and complementary to that style of dwelling.

    I therefore conclude that the proposal would not harm the character or appearance of the host dwelling or the streetscene and would accord with policy PP27 of the Poole Local Plan (adopted 2018) ‘LP’.

  4. Section 05

    Living conditions for occupants of host dwelling

    The dwelling’s layout includes the main living space and kitchen on the first floor with the ground floor used mainly for bedrooms. The roof of the proposed car port would sit just above a ground floor front room window which is currently used as a store.

    On my site visit I was able to have access to that room and found that the window was of a size which allowed the room to be well lit to its full depth by natural daylight. The proposed structure has no side walls, and the roof has rotating louvres and can let in additional light to the car port itself and the window, if that is judged desirable. In summary, the living conditions of the occupants of the appeal site would not be unduly affected by overshadowing or the loss of daylight or sunlight to that room as a result of the development, even if the roof louvres were closed. There would be no breach of policy PP27(1)(c) of the LP.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The Council suggested some conditions in the event that the appeal was successful. I have considered these in the light of Planning Practice Guidance. I have imposed a condition which ties the carrying out of the development to the approved plans, in order to avoid uncertainty. In order to protect the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area, I have imposed a condition that requires the car port to be constructed in accordance with the colour finish and materials specified.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    Having considered all representations made, for the reasons given above, I allow the appeal. [name].C.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4043No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    26 February 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    10 February 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3354025
Application reference
APP/24/00705/F
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Planning authority code
E06000058

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
24 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
18 October 2024
Valid date
18 October 2024
Start date
25 October 2024
Planning authority decision date
8 October 2024
Appeal decision date
26 February 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
65276
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21