Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3355141

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as decking to the south-east elevation.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for decking to the south-east elevation at [site address] , [name] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/24/01723/HOUS, subject to the following conditions.

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The external materials of the extension hereby permitted shall match those specified on the application form.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawings: 001, 002, and 6179.22.11 A.

    No external lighting shall be installed to the building or anywhere within the site. This exclusion shall not prohibit the installation of internal lighting or of sensor-controlled security lighting of 1,000 lumens or less, which shall be designed and shielded to minimise upwards light spillage.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    The site lies within the South Downs National Park which benefits from inspirational and varied landscapes, internationally important wildlife, rich cultural heritage, and vibrant market towns and villages. The statutory purposes of National Parks are to conserve and enhance their natural beauty, wildlife, and cultural heritage, and to promote opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of those areas by the public.

    Section 11A of The National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 (as amended) now includes the duty on relevant authorities that they must seek to further the purposes when exercising or performing any functions in relation to, or so as to affect, land in any National Park. Furthermore, the National Planning Policy Framework (“the Framework”) requires that great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues.

    The Authority’s description of the development, on its decision notice, differs from the description contained on the application for planning permission form. I have used the Authority’s description in the banner heading above as it concisely describes the development. This description is also used on the Appellant’s planning appeal form.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of existing residential occupants with particular reference to privacy and tranquillity, and the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal site includes a terrace style dwelling which is flanked by dwellings either side. The gardens, while landscaped with hedges and ornamental soft features, are generally open to this south-east side, and clear views are mutually possible across the garden areas of 1, 2 and 3 Hillview. The proposed development would introduce decking to the garden area of No 2 and this would moderately sit higher than existing sloping ground levels.

    Occupiers of the appeal site would be elevated over the existing ground levels with broadly clear and unobstructed views from the proposed decked areas into the garden areas and windows of No 1 and No 3. However, the increase in height would be modest and given the existing arrangement at these dwellings, the change in privacy and tranquillity would not be materially more harmful than the existing situation.

    The appeal site is well screened and set back from [address]. However, some views of the decking, and any domestic paraphernalia placed on it, could be possible from vantage points. Nevertheless, the moderate increase in height, size, position, and scale of the proposed development would have a limited impact when viewed against the existing terrace of dwellings particularly given the existing layout of the appeal site, which includes a garden where domestic paraphernalia is already sited. Accordingly, the proposal would conserve the relative tranquillity, distinctive character, pattern, and evolution of the landscape, while safeguarding its experiential and amenity qualities.

    The proposed development would therefore have an acceptable effect on the living conditions of existing residential occupants with particular reference to privacy and tranquillity, and the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would therefore comply with the relevant provisions of Policies SD1, SD4, SD5 and SD7 of the South Downs National Park Local Plan 2019. These, amongst other things, address the need for high quality design which respects the living conditions of residential occupiers and the landscape character of the area.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    While not shown as part of the proposed development, privacy screens are suggested in evidence and could be imposed via conditions. However, given the proposal does not materially harm the established level of privacy there is no need for me to consider the acceptability of privacy screens.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    The Authority has suggested conditions which I have considered and where necessary amended in line with national policy and guidance. In the interest of certainty, conditions specifying time, and the approved plans are needed. The details of materials are also necessary to ensure the proposed development integrates into the locality. Finally, a condition to control external illumination is necessary in the interests of amenity and to protect the South Downs International Dark Night Skies Reserve.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    For the above reasons, having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other relevant considerations, the appeal is allowed subject to the conditions listed above.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1630No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    13 June 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    20 May 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3355141
Application reference
SDNP/24/01723/HOUS
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
South Downs
Planning authority code
E26000010

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
12 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 November 2024
Valid date
7 November 2024
Start date
19 November 2024
Planning authority decision date
19 August 2024
Appeal decision date
13 June 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
71178
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21