Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3358086

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

9 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

change an existing small ground floor rear window into a French door.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted to change an existing small ground floor rear window into a French door at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 242081, and subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    In determining the appeal, I have used the description of development in the Council’s Decision Notice because it more concisely and accurately describes the acts of development when compared to the description given in the Application Form.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal relates to an agricultural Oast house that has been converted into a dwellinghouse. The house sits within a large curtilage and is surrounded by agricultural fields to the south and east, a semi wooded area to the west and a complex of agricultural buildings that have been converted to residential accommodation to the north west.

    The proposal is to change an existing small ground floor rear window on the south east elevation of the appeal building to a French door. The proposed scale and design of the door is modest and constrained, reflecting the simple agricultural character of the building. The proposed materials of the door and the brickwork detail above it would match the existing windows and doors on the house. Consequently, due to the scale, nature and detailing of the proposal, it would maintain the cohesive, balanced design of the building and would not harmfully diminish its agricultural character.

    For the reasons given, the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the host dwellings. Accordingly, it would comply with Policies RA5, LD1 and SD1 of the Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy 2011-2031 (October 2015) insofar as they require development to respect local context, site characteristics and maintain local distinctiveness. The proposal would also be in accordance with Policy LU2 of the Whitbourne Neighbourhood Development Plan 2011-2031 which requires proposals to respect the character of existing buildings.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    The appeal site is located proximate to listed buildings. While not forming a reason for refusal, I must consider this matter in light of my duties under section 66(1) and 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation areas) Act 1990 (as amended).

    Meadow Green and [address] are both Grade II Listed Buildings located to the north west of the appeal site. Due to the scale, nature and location of the proposal, and the intervening buildings and distance between the appeal site and the listed buildings, the setting of the listed buildings would be preserved, and their significance would not be harmed.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    A standard time condition for the commencement of development and a condition requiring compliance with the approved plans are necessary to provide precision and certainty. A matching materials condition is necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the host building.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, the appeal should be allowed.

  8. Section 09

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following drawings: Site Location Plan 01 v1; Existing Block Plan 02 v1; [name] 03 v1; [name] 04 v1; and Existing and [name] 05 v1.

    The external materials of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building. End of Conditions

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4744No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    16 May 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    6 May 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3358086
Application reference
242081
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Herefordshire Council
Planning authority code
E06000019

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
0 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
23 December 2024
Valid date
23 December 2024
Start date
15 January 2025
Planning authority decision date
12 December 2024
Appeal decision date
16 May 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
69588
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21