Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3358771

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of a front extension and new proposed side extension with pitched roof.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for the erection of a front extension and new proposed side extension with pitched roof at [site address] , Hounslow [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2024/3128, subject to the conditions set out in the schedule to this decision.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a part 2-storey part single storey semi-detached house within an estate style residential area containing a variety of building styles and sizes. The existing dwelling stands to one side of a prominent corner plot at the junction of [address] and [address].

    The proposal is a ground floor extension that would wrap around the front and side of the 2-storey house. A significantly larger building would result with an extended front elevation that would be evident from the road. The size of the new addition and its prominence in the streetscape could not reasonably be described as minor, which is expected of front extensions in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Document, [name] (SPD).

    Nevertheless, the proposal has been designed to complement the form, scale, and design of the existing house. It would be a proportionate addition to the host building with a hipped roof form and external materials that would be in keeping with the general style of the existing dwelling. The main 2-storey house would remain clearly legible with the new built form in place.

    The new front wall would be set back from the existing gable facing the road. A good-sized gap would also be retained between the completed dwelling and the side boundary of the site. Consequently, a sense of space would be retained between the finished building and the adjacent junction with no visual disharmony in the local street scene.

    For all these reasons, the proposed extension would not appear overly large, bulky or incongruous. By complementing the intrinsic character of the host building and respecting the character and qualities of the local area, the proposal would not be obtrusive. As such, it would adhere to the key principles of the SPD. Therefore, a conflict with some of the advice within the SPD is insufficient reason to withhold planning permission.

    On the main issue, I conclude that the proposed development would not cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the host building or the local area. As such, it does not conflict with Policies CC1, CC2 and SC7 of the Hounslow Local Plan 2015-2030. These policies aim to ensure that development complements the original building and maintains the character of the street scene.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, it is necessary to impose a condition that requires the development to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans for certainty. To ensure the satisfactory appearance of the development, a condition is imposed to require that the external materials match those of the existing building. Given the modest size of the extension and its inclusion within the main house, it would un-suited for independent business or residential use. For clarity, I have therefore attached a condition that restricts the use of the extension. These conditions reflect those suggested by the Council with an amendment made to the restriction on the use of the extension in the interests of concision.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    Overall, there are no material considerations that indicate the proposal should be determined other than in accordance with the development plan. For the reasons set out above, I therefore conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

  6. Section 07

    Schedule of conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 20-SM-XX-S-DR-A-001, 20-SM-XX-S-DR-A-002 [name], SM-XX-00-DR-A-101, SM-XX-00-DR-A-102, SM-XX-00-3D-A-900 and the Location Plan, which shows the site edged red.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The extension hereby permitted shall not be occupied at any time other than for purposes ancillary to the residential use of the dwelling known as [site address] , Hounslow [postcode] .

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 287No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    28 February 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    21 February 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3358771
Application reference
P/2024/3128
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Planning authority code
E09000018

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
10 January 2025
Valid date
10 January 2025
Start date
22 January 2025
Planning authority decision date
18 November 2024
Appeal decision date
28 February 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
65471
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21