Appeal 3359847
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
erection of two storey extension and single storey rear extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a two-storey extension and single storey rear extension at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/04210/FUL, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following
Section 03
conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
No development shall commence until details and/or samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the roofing and external walls of the extensions hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and/or samples.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: location plans 1/2, 5423.05 proposed ground floor plan, 5423.06 proposed first floor plan, 5423.07 proposed west elevation, 5423.08 proposed east elevation, 5423.09 proposed north and south elevations and 5423.10 proposed site plan.
The two-storey extension hereby permitted shall not be occupied until the first-floor bathroom window at the rear elevation has been fitted with obscured glazing. Details of the type of obscured glazing shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the window is installed and once installed the obscured glazing shall be retained thereafter.
Section 04
[name]
I have amended the description of development to include reference to the first-floor rear extension as proposed.
Section 05
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the building and surrounding area.
Section 06
Reasons
The appeal building is a detached two-bedroom bungalow located within a residential area comprised mainly of detached dwellings set within gardens.
The Council considers that the proposed single storey rear extension would be of an appropriate design and scale. I see no reason to disagree, as that part of the proposal would cause no harm to the character and appearance of dwelling, or the living conditions of neighbours.
The proposed two storey side extension would be sited across the end wall of the bungalow and would have a front gable. Adequate garden land would be retained and there would be no harm to the residential amenity of neighbours. The extension would have a higher ridge height than that of the bungalow. However, I consider that the increase in height would not be excessive, in particular when the context of surrounding development is taken into account. The neighbouring dwelling of [name] has a large two storey projection with a gable at its front elevation. The new build dwelling of Bread and Roses at the rear of Hillberry has a prominent two storey side element. Other dwellings in the vicinity vary greatly in form and layout. Therefore, I consider that the proposed two storey extension would be of an appropriate scale and design and would cause no cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the appeal building and surrounding area.
The proposed development would not conflict with policy CS6 of the [name] and policy MD2 of the Shropshire Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan which together require proposals to respect local context and character. It would comply with the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Section 07
Conditions
In addition to the standard condition regarding the commencement of development, a condition is imposed to ensure that appropriate external materials are used in the interest of complementing the character and appearance of the building and surrounding area. A condition is added to confirm the plans hereby permitted. A condition also requires the installation of obscure glazing in the proposed bathroom window in order to protect the privacy of neighbours.
Section 08
Conclusion
The proposed development would comply with the development plan as a whole and should be allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 108No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 26 March 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 13 March 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3359847
- Application reference
- 24/04210/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Planning authority code
- E06000051
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 1
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 30 January 2025
- Valid date
- 5 February 2025
- Start date
- 26 February 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 17 December 2024
- Appeal decision date
- 26 March 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 66940
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:28
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21