Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3359883

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the replacement of existing windows and doors in 3 phases.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the replacement of existing windows and doors at [site address] , Aughton, Lancashire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2024/0749/FUL and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 2673/PH/1 2673/PH/2 and 2673/PH/3.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area having regard to its conservation area status.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property, No [site address] , (No 6) is a detached inter-war property situate within the Granville Park Conservation Area(GPCA) where there is a statutory duty to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character of the area. In addition, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) states that great weight should be attached to the conservation of designated heritage assets, in this case the GPCA.

    No full conservation area analysis is before me but from the information before me and my observations on my site visit, the special characteristics of the GPCA are the setting of predominantly large Victorian villas within generous plot sizes in a serpentine layout in a mature verdant setting. There is considerable diversity in the style and design of the dwellings and several dwellings have benefitted from contemporary extensions or alterations incorporating large areas of glass, and modern features and materials. The use of timber is no longer a consistent feature within the GPCA and there are examples of UPVC windows replacement in several of the dwellings. Taken together, the wide variety of contemporary redevelopment, and mix of materials contribute significantly to the present day character of the GPCA.

    No 6 is one of several inter-war dwellings described as having a positive impact on the character of the GPCA. It stands well back from the highway within a generous plot. An UPVC conservatory granted permission in 2002 has been erected at the side of the dwelling. Properties closest to No 6 and which provide much of the immediate visual context, including No [address], which is of a similar design to No 6, have had UPVC windows fitted.

    From the officer report and information before me, it seems that the use of UPVC windows on the rear elevations of No 6 is not ruled out per se and may be considered to be acceptable to the Council. I accept that the proposed replacement UPVC windows would subtly alter the character and appearance of No 6 and hence the GPCA. However the dwelling is set well back from the highway, is well screened by mature landscaping and the majority of the windows would be largely shielded from views and be unobtrusive in the street scene. The submitted drawings show the maintenance of existing fenestration design and types. Given the distances and screening from the highway, and other nearby examples, the modern materials would not in my view materially detract from the character of the dwelling and the wider area. As such the proposal would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the GPCA.

    I therefore conclude that the proposed replacement windows would have a neutral effect that would preserve the character and appearance of the GPCA causing no harm to its significance. Accordingly the question of public benefits to outweigh any harm does not arise. As such I find no conflict with the Framework or Local Plan Policies GN3 and EN4 of the West Lancashire Local Plan 2012-2027 (adopted October 2013) which require development proposals to have regard to the historic character and to seek to preserve or enhance the heritage asset.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions and Conclusion

    I have attached a plans and time condition in the interest of certainty. For the reasons outlined above I allow the appeal.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1974No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    28 April 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    15 April 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3359883
Application reference
2024/0749/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
West Lancashire District Council
Planning authority code
E07000127

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
No
Historic building grant made
No
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
No
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
No

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
31 January 2025
Valid date
3 February 2025
Start date
20 February 2025
Planning authority decision date
10 January 2025
Appeal decision date
28 April 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
68604
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21