Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3360297

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

fenestration replacement.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for fenestration replacement at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2024/03940/PA, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following condition:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Moseley Conservation Area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property comprises a detached two-storey 20th Century white-rendered dwelling with decorative brick dressings. It is located in a largely residential area close to [name].

    The dwelling is set well back from the road behind a hedgerow and front garden/parking area and has a long garden to the rear. It is located within the Moseley Conservation Area, characterised by the presence of a range of attractive period dwellings set within green and spacious surroundings.

    Dwellings along [address], within Moseley Conservation Area, demonstrate a variety of styles, and include Arts and Crafts, revivalist and early 20th Century dwelling types. This together with the generous spacing of dwellings within comfortable garden plots, provides for an attractive street-scene with a strong sense of the area’s rich built heritage.

    During my site visit, I observed that whilst much of the original architectural integrity of dwellings along [address] remains intact, there have been a number of changes and alterations over the years. This includes changes to fenestration and I note that in this regard, the appellant has provided details including examples of the replacement of original windows with heritage-type modern windows.

    In general, the setting back of dwellings from the road means that such minor changes do not detract from the positive contribution that the dwellings make to the significance of Moseley Conservation Area.

    I noted during my site visit that the appeal dwelling has been impacted by subsidence and in this regard, I am mindful of the detailed evidence before me demonstrating how this has resulted in the warping of the windows that it is proposed to replace, which themselves are not the dwelling’s original windows.

    The proposed replacement windows would comprise timber-replica windows. Whilst they would be uPVC rather than timber, the difference in appearance would, due to the replica design of the replacement windows and the considerable setting back of the dwelling from the road, have no discernible impact on the character and appearance of Moseley Conservation Area. Observed from a distance, the proposed replica windows would appear in keeping with the historical appearance of the host dwelling.

    The overall appearance of the appeal dwelling would be little changed whilst the functionality of the windows would be improved.

    Further, I am particularly mindful that there are examples of windows along [address] have already been replaced with windows that are little different to those proposed by the application the subject of this appeal whilst maintaining the integrity of the Moseley Conservation Area.

    Taking all of the above into account, I find that the proposed development would preserve the character and appearance of the Moseley Conservation Area. The proposal would not be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework; or to Policies PG3 and TP12 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017), which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, the appeal is successful.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    16 July 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    1 July 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3360297
Application reference
2024/03940/PA
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Birmingham City Council
Planning authority code
E08000025

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 February 2025
Valid date
27 February 2025
Start date
2 April 2025
Planning authority decision date
5 December 2024
Appeal decision date
16 July 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
73050
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21