Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3360326

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a rear first floor balcony off kitchen.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for a rear first floor balcony off kitchen at [site address] , Brighouse, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 24/00766/HSE, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin no later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: [name]. 2- Plans as proposed.

    The balcony hereby permitted shall not be brought into first use until the opaque glass privacy balustrade as shown on drawing No 2 - Plans as proposed has been installed and shall be retained as such for the lifetime of the development.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Preliminary Matters

    The refusal reason on the Council’s Decision notice states that the properties on [address] are affected by the proposal when in fact it is those on [address]. This has been subsequently confirmed by the Council and is reflected in the main issue below.

  4. Section 05

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed balcony extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of properties on [address] with specific regard to privacy.

  5. Section 06

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    The appeal dwelling faces the rear of properties on [address], separated by [address]. The surrounding area is residential and is characterised by modest two and three storey terraced properties. The rear of the terrace containing the appeal property is staggered with its rear elevation set back from the rear façade of the adjacent property at [address]. [address] runs obliquely to [address] and rear gardens become longer close to the appeal property.

    The proposal would introduce a small balcony onto the rear of the property at first floor level accessed from the kitchen. Whilst it would allow views of the rear elevations and gardens of these properties the appeal property is located within an urban block where properties have rear yards and gardens and a degree of overlooking already exists.

    The appeal plans show the balcony would be fitted with an opaque glazed screen which would mean that occupiers of the balcony when seated would not be afforded views of neighbouring properties. Furthermore, given the location and size of the proposed balcony, the impact would not be too dissimilar to the existing situation from the kitchen window of the appeal dwelling where there is already a degree of mutual overlooking over the gardens in that respect.

    The proposed balcony also possesses a modest depth and is likely to be used for activities such as sitting where the proposed opaque privacy screen would maintain a sufficient level of privacy for garden users of [address].

    I therefore conclude that the appeal scheme would not harm the living conditions of the occupiers of properties on [address] with specific regard to privacy. The proposal therefore complies with Policy BT2 of the Calderdale Local Plan (2023) which seeks to secure a reasonable degree of privacy in dwellings and prevent overlooking between existing dwellings.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    Time limit and plans conditions are necessary and reasonable in order to provide certainty. In order to ensure that adequate privacy is maintained a condition has been included to secure the provision of the opaque glass balustrade to the rear elevation in the interests of the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. As this is specified on the submitted plans neither party would be prejudiced by the inclusion of a condition to this effect. As the proposal is for a balcony it is not necessary to impose a condition requiring materials to match the existing building.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    The proposal would accord with the development plan, when taken as a whole, and there are no material considerations that indicate the appeal should be determined other than in accordance with the development plan. For the reasons given above and having had regard to all other matters raised, I recommend that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 3511No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    19 June 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    1 April 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3360326
Application reference
24/00766/HSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Planning authority code
E08000033

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
6 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 February 2025
Valid date
7 February 2025
Start date
28 February 2025
Planning authority decision date
26 November 2024
Appeal decision date
19 June 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
71540
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21