Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3360775

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

Erection of a two storey front extension and dormer window. Erection of an attached garage with dormer window. Dropped kerb to provide access to new garage.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for ‘Erection of a two storey front extension and dormer window. Erection of an attached garage with dormer window. Dropped kerb to provide access to new garage’ at [site address] , Ravenshead, Nottinghamshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2024/0829, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with Location Plan Planning Portal Reference: PP-13580548v1 and drawing nos DLS/NOV/2024/0101/BP, DLS/NOV/2024/0101/PP-PE1, DLS/NOV/2024/0101/PP-PE2, DLS/2024/NOV/1115/PP-GF, DLS/2024/NOV/1115/PP-FF and DLS/2024/NOV/1115/PP-GF&FF-D.

    The external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in the materials shown on drawing nos DLS/NOV/2024/0101/PP- PE1 and DLS/NOV/2024/0101/PP-PE2.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    The description of development on the application form refers to a two-storey front elevation. In the header above, I have amended this to a two-storey front extension, in line with the Decision Notice and appeal form, as this more accurately describes the proposal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a dormer bungalow on a corner plot at the junction of [address] and [address]. Although many of the properties in the area are bungalows, the design of the properties and the materials used vary significantly. Some of the properties have also been altered or extended. There are examples of single- and two-storey front extensions, some of which have been finished with render, and front dormer windows in the vicinity of the appeal site. Overall, there is no overarching character or appearance to the street scene.

    Guidance in the Gedling Borough Council Design Code Framework states that properties should contribute to the character of the local area and avoid any design features that continue to erode their character. Whilst the proposed two-storey front extension would alter the single-storey nature of the existing bungalow, it would not be out of place in the street scene given the presence of other two-storey front extensions nearby. Similarly, the render finish and front dormers would also tie in with other nearby properties.

    The proposed garage would be at an angle to the main building, to follow the building line along [address], and it would be at a lower ground level than the main dwelling. Consequently, despite its width the garage would appear subservient to the existing dwelling. Overall, the proposed extension, dormers and garage would not unduly detract from the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the area.

    The proposal would therefore accord with Policy 10 of the [name] Part 1 Local Plan (2014) and Policy LPD 43 of the Gedling Borough Local Planning Document Part 2 Local Plan (2018), insofar as they require development including extensions to be in keeping with the surrounding character in terms of height, built form, massing, scale and materials.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, I have attached a condition specifying the approved plans in the interests of certainty. A condition requiring the exterior materials to match the details shown on the approved plans is necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the appeal property and the street scene.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above the appeal should be allowed subject to the conditions listed above.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 5869No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 June 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    22 April 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3360775
Application reference
2024/0829
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Gedling Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000173

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
No
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
17 February 2025
Valid date
17 February 2025
Start date
19 February 2025
Planning authority decision date
17 January 2025
Appeal decision date
3 June 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
70465
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21