Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 3361917

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

existing 1200mm x 1200mm downstairs right hand side window to be replaced with 1200mm wide x 2100mm high French doors. Front door with small A4 sized window to be replaced with a door comprising 2 off windows in the top half.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a relatively modern detached two storey dwelling constructed from stone to a traditional design. The dwelling is set back from Greenhill behind a tall stone wall and garden area. The dwelling is located in a residential area, where dwellings tend to comprise terraced cottages of brick and stone construction, as well as occasional newer stone-built dwellings of traditional appearance.

    The appeal property is situated within Wirksworth Conservation Area, characterised by the presence of a wide range of attractive period properties, including the 13th [name] of [name], 16th Century alms-houses, Georgian townhouses, and many 18th and 19th Century commercial, industrial, public and residential buildings.

    The appeal dwelling is situated along Greenhill, which is a steep, narrow street. A long terrace runs alongside Greenhill close to the appeal dwelling and the dwellings within this terrace sit immediately adjacent to the street, presenting doors and windows of period appearance to the street frontage. This results in a strong and attractive sense of heritage.

    Whilst a much more modern building, the appeal dwelling has clearly been designed to present a traditional frontage to the street. The small window in its plain door and the presence of relatively small windows serve to maintain the traditional appearance of dwellings fronting Greenhill.

    The proposed development would introduce a front door of much more modern appearance, and I find that this, when combined with the replacement of a ground floor window with French doors, would severely detract from the appeal dwelling’s traditional qualities.

    I find that the proposed development would introduce much larger areas of glazing and in so doing, would significantly disrupt the window to walling ratio of the appeal dwelling’s front elevation. This would occur to such an extent that the frontage would take on a distinctly modern domestic quality, more akin to the rear elevation of a modern house. As such, the proposal would detract significantly from the identified traditional qualities that make a positive contribution to Greenhill’s character and appearance.

    Taking all of the above into account, I find that the proposal would detract from and would not conserve the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area. Having regard to paragraph 215 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and to Planning Practice Guidance, I consider that the harm to the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area would be less than substantial.

    This needs to be balanced against any public benefits the development may bring and this regard, there is nothing before me that comprises or amounts to a public benefit that outweighs the harm identified.

    Taking all of this into account, I find that the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the Wirksworth Conservation Area, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework and to Derbyshire Dales Local Plan (2017) Policies PD1, PD2 and HC10, which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, the appeal does not succeed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    21 November 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    11 November 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3361917
Application reference
24/01019/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Derbyshire Dales District Council
Planning authority code
E07000035

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
7 March 2025
Valid date
7 March 2025
Start date
21 October 2025
Planning authority decision date
15 January 2025
Appeal decision date
21 November 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
80117
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21