Appeal 3361917
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
5 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
existing 1200mm x 1200mm downstairs right hand side window to be replaced with 1200mm wide x 2100mm high French doors. Front door with small A4 sized window to be replaced with a door comprising 2 off windows in the top half.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is dismissed.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area.
Section 04
Reasons
The appeal property is a relatively modern detached two storey dwelling constructed from stone to a traditional design. The dwelling is set back from Greenhill behind a tall stone wall and garden area. The dwelling is located in a residential area, where dwellings tend to comprise terraced cottages of brick and stone construction, as well as occasional newer stone-built dwellings of traditional appearance.
The appeal property is situated within Wirksworth Conservation Area, characterised by the presence of a wide range of attractive period properties, including the 13th [name] of [name], 16th Century alms-houses, Georgian townhouses, and many 18th and 19th Century commercial, industrial, public and residential buildings.
The appeal dwelling is situated along Greenhill, which is a steep, narrow street. A long terrace runs alongside Greenhill close to the appeal dwelling and the dwellings within this terrace sit immediately adjacent to the street, presenting doors and windows of period appearance to the street frontage. This results in a strong and attractive sense of heritage.
Whilst a much more modern building, the appeal dwelling has clearly been designed to present a traditional frontage to the street. The small window in its plain door and the presence of relatively small windows serve to maintain the traditional appearance of dwellings fronting Greenhill.
The proposed development would introduce a front door of much more modern appearance, and I find that this, when combined with the replacement of a ground floor window with French doors, would severely detract from the appeal dwelling’s traditional qualities.
I find that the proposed development would introduce much larger areas of glazing and in so doing, would significantly disrupt the window to walling ratio of the appeal dwelling’s front elevation. This would occur to such an extent that the frontage would take on a distinctly modern domestic quality, more akin to the rear elevation of a modern house. As such, the proposal would detract significantly from the identified traditional qualities that make a positive contribution to Greenhill’s character and appearance.
Taking all of the above into account, I find that the proposal would detract from and would not conserve the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area. Having regard to paragraph 215 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and to Planning Practice Guidance, I consider that the harm to the character and appearance of Wirksworth Conservation Area would be less than substantial.
This needs to be balanced against any public benefits the development may bring and this regard, there is nothing before me that comprises or amounts to a public benefit that outweighs the harm identified.
Taking all of this into account, I find that the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the Wirksworth Conservation Area, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework and to Derbyshire Dales Local Plan (2017) Policies PD1, PD2 and HC10, which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.
Section 05
Conclusion
For the reasons given above, the appeal does not succeed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 21 November 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 11 November 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3361917
- Application reference
- 24/01019/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Derbyshire Dales District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000035
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Yes
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Dismissed
- Decision category
- Dismissed
- Received date
- 7 March 2025
- Valid date
- 7 March 2025
- Start date
- 21 October 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 15 January 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 21 November 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 80117
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21