Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3363117

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the formation of a garage and parking space.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the formation of a garage and parking space at [site address] , Torbay, [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2024/0796, and subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match or complement those used in the existing buildings on the site.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with following approved plans: [name] extract Location Plan dated 15.11.2024 2001 A.D.125 [name] dated 01.12.2024 P2024-0796-1 [name] dated 27.12.2022 P2024-0796-2 [name] dated 27.12.2022 P2024-0796-3 [name] dated 31.10.2021 P2024-0796-4 [name] dated 31.12.2022 P2024-0796-5 [name] dated 31.10.2021

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect the proposed development would have on the character and appearance of the appeal site frontage in the context of the local street scene.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is situated on the north side of [address] where the street frontage is characterised by frequent and varied modifications to property frontages to facilitate off-street parking. Invariably, these comprise paved spaces of rather stark appearance at the rear of the footway excavated into the sloping ground and surrounded by retaining walls.

    The original approach in the design of the appeal proposal is to excavate further into the site frontage and create a low-level, virtually subterranean garage under a green sedum roof, and placing an area of hardstanding behind the front boundary wall, in effect replacing much of the area of the front garden that would be disturbed.

    I appreciate the concern of the Council that, despite the insertion of parking bays along the [address] frontage, the original sloping gardens with softening vegetation and side driveways and garages have generally been retained and that this aspect of the street scene would be disrupted by the appeal development.

    On the other hand, whilst the garage would still stand somewhat taller than the front boundary wall, the garage and hardstanding would be contained within the site, avoiding the exposed and unrelieved paved area immediately behind the footway which is a feature of many the nearby properties.

    Thus, whilst the design of the appeal proposal is certainly different from the more orthodox solutions used elsewhere along [address] and in the wider area, in my judgement the development would not appear unduly incongruous or uncharacteristic in the context of the wider, varied street scene. Moreover, there is some prospect that the side and front boundaries to the site could be reinforced by new planting, as indicated on the submitted plans, which would further soften the appearance of the frontage.

    I agree with the Council that the examples of existing frontage car parking arrangements in [address], quoted in support of the appeal, are not necessarily directly comparable and may not have been authorised. I also agree that a previous appeal allowing car parking at a property in [address], some distance away, is not directly relevant, as the details of development and the topography of the site are substantially different. So, whilst acknowledging that the Council has refused several previous proposals at the appeal site more comparable with the present scheme but with sliding security gates, I have considered the present case on its individual merits and in current circumstances.

    For the reasons explained, I consider that the proposed development would comply with Policy DE1 of the adopted Torbay Local Plan as well as with Policy PNP1(c) of the made Paignton Neighbourhood Plan which, together, consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework, require development to be well designed to respect its surroundings. I therefore consider the proposal to be compliant with development plan as a whole and conclude that this appeal should be allowed, subject only to standard conditions.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1576No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    27 May 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 May 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3363117
Application reference
P/2024/0796
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Torbay Council
Planning authority code
E06000027

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
27 March 2025
Valid date
7 April 2025
Start date
7 April 2025
Planning authority decision date
21 January 2025
Appeal decision date
27 May 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
70064
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21