Appeal 3363442
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
a single storey rear extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey rear extension at [site address] , Culcheth and Glazebury, Warrington [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2025/00133/FULH, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: Proposed Plan & Elevations 150080125/2.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the proposed development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 03
Appeal Procedure and Main Issue
The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal. The main issue for which is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Number 7 Lansdowne (No.
with specific regard to light and outlook.
Section 04
Reasons for the Recommendation
The adjoining property at No. 7 has a set of French doors that open on to its rear garden, allowing light into the living room, only a small distance from the shared solid timber fenced boundary. Consequently, the proposed extension would slightly impinge guidance around the ’45 degree code’ set out in the House Extensions Supplementary Planning Document 2021 (SPD). The SPD is guidance only and no such rule is set out in the development plan policies provided. Given the height of the existing boundary fence, along with the width and height of the French doors, and a further source of light from the existing window in the front elevation, the proposal would have only a marginal effect on the amount of morning light that would reach the living room. It would, therefore, not cause the room to be noticeably darker or significantly alter the outlook, which would be primarily over what is otherwise an open, unincumbered and generously sized rear garden.
Any alleged lack of detail on the submitted plans has not hindered my ability to assess the potential effects of the proposal based on its design, its slight set in position relative to No. 7 and my observations on site. Therefore, the proposed extension would not cause harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. Consequently, it would accord with Policy DC6 of the Warrington Local Plan 2023, which seeks to ensure development does not adversely impact the amenity of neighbouring occupants amongst other things.
Section 05
Conditions
In addition to the standard time period for commencement of the development, I have attached a condition requiring it to accord with the approved plans, for enforcement purposes. A condition requiring the use of materials matching that of the existing building is also necessary to ensure an appropriate appearance.
Section 06
Conclusion and Recommendation
The appeal scheme would comply with the development plan for the reasons I have set out and there is nothing to suggest a decision other than in accordance therewith. I therefore recommend the appeal is allowed, subject to the conditions specified.
Section 07
Inspector’s Decision
I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, subject to the conditions set out.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 20 May 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 29 April 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3363442
- Application reference
- 2025/00133/FULH
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Warrington Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E06000007
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 27,550 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 2 April 2025
- Valid date
- 4 April 2025
- Start date
- 4 April 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 20 May 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 69738
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:28
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21