Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3363442

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a single storey rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey rear extension at [site address] , Culcheth and Glazebury, Warrington [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2025/00133/FULH, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: Proposed Plan & Elevations 150080125/2.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the proposed development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure and Main Issue

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal. The main issue for which is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Number 7 Lansdowne (No.

    with specific regard to light and outlook.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    The adjoining property at No. 7 has a set of French doors that open on to its rear garden, allowing light into the living room, only a small distance from the shared solid timber fenced boundary. Consequently, the proposed extension would slightly impinge guidance around the ’45 degree code’ set out in the House Extensions Supplementary Planning Document 2021 (SPD). The SPD is guidance only and no such rule is set out in the development plan policies provided. Given the height of the existing boundary fence, along with the width and height of the French doors, and a further source of light from the existing window in the front elevation, the proposal would have only a marginal effect on the amount of morning light that would reach the living room. It would, therefore, not cause the room to be noticeably darker or significantly alter the outlook, which would be primarily over what is otherwise an open, unincumbered and generously sized rear garden.

    Any alleged lack of detail on the submitted plans has not hindered my ability to assess the potential effects of the proposal based on its design, its slight set in position relative to No. 7 and my observations on site. Therefore, the proposed extension would not cause harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. Consequently, it would accord with Policy DC6 of the Warrington Local Plan 2023, which seeks to ensure development does not adversely impact the amenity of neighbouring occupants amongst other things.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time period for commencement of the development, I have attached a condition requiring it to accord with the approved plans, for enforcement purposes. A condition requiring the use of materials matching that of the existing building is also necessary to ensure an appropriate appearance.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    The appeal scheme would comply with the development plan for the reasons I have set out and there is nothing to suggest a decision other than in accordance therewith. I therefore recommend the appeal is allowed, subject to the conditions specified.

  6. Section 07

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, subject to the conditions set out.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    20 May 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    29 April 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3363442
Application reference
2025/00133/FULH
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Warrington Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000007

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
27,550 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
2 April 2025
Valid date
4 April 2025
Start date
4 April 2025
Planning authority decision date
27 March 2025
Appeal decision date
20 May 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
69738
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21