Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3368542

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a single-storey side and rear extension, replacing an existing garage, utility room, and conservatory.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for a single-storey side and rear extension, replacing an existing garage, utility room, and conservatory at [site address] , [site address] , Staffordshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2025/0120, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, numbered: 002; 010; 011 Revision 3; 012 Revision 3; 014 Revision 3 and 015 Revision 3.

    No development above ground level shall take place until details / samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details / samples.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [site address] is a detached bungalow set within a row of residential properties that front the road. The property has a large front and side garden, which includes a driveway that leads to an attached flat roof garage. The surrounding area is primarily residential in character and includes a mix of housing types.

    Facing materials of existing houses, including the appeal property, primarily comprise red bricks with tiled roofs. Some of the dwellings have render and timber boarding features on their front elevations, and there are some examples of stone-built cottages along the road also.

    The design and appearance of the proposed extension would be contemporary, with grey vertical composite cladding on the elevations, and black window frames. It would have a flat roof with a grey aluminium parapet capping. As such, it would be a distinctive extension, and with the modern facing materials, supplemented by new render to the existing dwelling, it would represent a high design quality.

    Despite the height of the proposed extension marginally exceeding the height of the eaves of the main dwelling, it would have a modest size and scale. It would also be significantly set back from the front elevation of the house, which would be subordinate to the design of the original dwelling. Furthermore, and for the same reasons as set out above, the proposal would not be prominent within the street scene. Therefore, in combination with its high design quality, the proposal would be an appropriate addition to the host property and surrounding area.

    For the reasons outlined above, I conclude that the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the host property or the area. As such, the proposal would accord with Policies SS8 and DC1 of the Staffordshire Moorlands Local Plan and Policy DES 1 of the Biddulph Neighbourhood Plan. These together and amongst other things, seek to encourage distinctive, site-specific architectural solutions that are high quality and add value to the area.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, I have also, in the interests of certainty, attached a condition specifying the approved plans. To ensure that the appearance of the development is satisfactory, a condition is imposed to require samples of the external materials to be approved, prior to above ground level construction works.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4685No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    27 August 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    20 August 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3368542
Application reference
SMD/2025/0120
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
Planning authority code
E07000198

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
23 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
1 July 2025
Valid date
1 July 2025
Start date
2 July 2025
Planning authority decision date
15 May 2025
Appeal decision date
27 August 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
75365
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21