Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3369347

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

3 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

single storey rear extension (Depth 6m, Maximum height of extension 3m, Height to eaves 3m).

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    Appeal A is allowed and prior approval is deemed to be granted under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, [name].4. of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for a single storey rear extension (Depth 6m, Maximum height of extension 3m, Height to eaves 3m) at [site address] , in accordance with the application Ref 25/00543/PARES made on 15 May 2025, and the details submitted with it pursuant to Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, paragraph A.4(2).

    Appeal B is allowed and prior approval is deemed to be granted under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, [name].4. of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for a single storey rear extension (Depth 6m, Maximum height of extension 3m, Height to eaves 3m) at [site address] , in accordance with the application Ref 25/00544/PARES made on 15 May 2025, and the details submitted with it pursuant to Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, paragraph A.4(2). Appeal Decisions APP/B0230/D/25/3369347, APP/B0230/D/25/3369351

  2. Section 03

    Reasons

    [name].1.(g) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO) permits the enlargement of a detached dwellinghouse by the erection of a single storey extension that extends no more than 8 metres from the rear of the original dwellinghouse, or 6 metres in the case of any other dwellinghouse subject to the process of prior approval set out at [name].4. being followed.

    [name].4.(10)(c) outlines that the development subject to the prior approval process must not begin before the expiry of 42 days following the date on which the required prior approval information was received by the local planning authority without the local planning authority notifying the developer as to whether prior approval is given or refused.

    The effect of this is that where an application is made for a determination as to whether prior approval is required, the applicant can proceed with the development if the Local Planning Authority does not make a determination or notify the appellant of their decision within the statutory 42 day period. Prior approval is deemed to be granted.

    The applications, the subject of these appeals, were received by the Council on 16 May 2025. The decision notices issued by the Council are both dated 07 July 2025, which falls outside of the statutory 42 day period beginning 16 May 2025. There is limited evidence before me to indicate the information required by the appellant, as set out in paragraph A.4 (2) of the GPDO, was not all received by the Council on 16 May 2025.

    As the Council failed to notify the appellant of their decision within the requisite 42 day period as to whether prior approval was given or refused it means that prior approval is deemed to be granted. A neighbour consultation is therefore not required.

    The failure of the Council to validate the application and determine it within the statutory period means that I cannot consider whether the development would otherwise be permitted development under the GPDO. However, this does not mean that carrying out the development would be lawful. The development can only lawfully proceed if carried out in accordance with the conditions and limitations imposed on the planning permission granted by the GPDO. It is for the appellant to satisfy themselves that the development conforms with all relevant conditions and limitations of the GPDO. If it does not, the GPDO does not grant it planning permission and the development, if constructed, may be at risk of enforcement action by the Council.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 5200No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 September 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    2 September 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3369347
Application reference
25/00543/PARES
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Luton Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000032

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
3. Refused prior approval of permitted development rights
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Lead

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
16 July 2025
Valid date
16 July 2025
Start date
24 July 2025
Planning authority decision date
7 July 2025
Appeal decision date
3 September 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
75736
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21