Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3370004

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for the installation of a domestic air source heat pump.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the installation of a domestic air source heat pump at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref. 25/0222/FUL, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: location plan, proposed block plan, 25/0222/FUL-FLR- 1, 25/0222/FUL-ELE-1.

    The air pump shall not be brought into use until a scheme of soft landscaping has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.

    All planting comprised in the soft landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting season following the completion of the development. The completed soft landscaping scheme shall be retained for the lifetime of the development. Any trees or shrubs which die, or are damaged, removed or seriously diseased shall be replaced by those of a similar size and species to those originally planted.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and locality.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site lies on the junction of [address], [address] and [address] and relates to a detached, two-storey house with accommodation in the roof. The local area is mainly residential in nature. __________________________________________________________________________________________

    I acknowledge the Council's concerns in that the scheme would be in a prominent position and clearly visible from the public domain. However, I am aware that the heat pump would be of diminutive proportions and can be screened by soft landscaping. This would add some verdant interest to the side garden of the appeal property and provide modest benefits to local biodiversity.

    Moreover, the appellant has outlined the rationale for the location of the heat pump; I am satisfied that sufficient justification has been given to explain why the east elevation is the most appropriate position for the unit. I have also borne in mind that such low-carbon energy sources are to be encouraged, and that the Council's Environmental Health service has been consulted on the proposal and raised no objection in relation to noise.

    Taken in the round, I consider that the proposal would not be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and locality. It would be in accordance with Policy EC2 of the Castle Point Borough Local Plan (1998), which seeks to secure schemes of acceptable scale and design. It would also be consistent with the advice in the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that good design is a key aspect of sustainable development.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of advice in Planning Policy Guidance and the Framework. In addition to the standard implementation condition, the approved plans are listed for certainty. A condition requiring the completion of a landscaping scheme would ensure the Council has control over the height and variety of hedgerow planting, to ensure that the proposal integrates with the site and surrounds; given the importance of the scheme, I consider it to be necessary for the lifetime of the development.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    Having regard to the foregoing and all other matters raised, the appeal is successful.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 212No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    30 September 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    17 September 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3370004
Application reference
25/0222/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Castle Point Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000069

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
28 July 2025
Valid date
28 July 2025
Start date
6 August 2025
Planning authority decision date
20 May 2025
Appeal decision date
30 September 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
77146
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21