Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3370108

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as “creation of a roof terrace over first floor bathroom, accessed from existing dormer window.”

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for “creation of a roof terrace over first floor bathroom, accessed from existing dormer window” at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 25/01066/FUL, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with: Location Plan, AE201 P1, AP002 P1 and AP000 P1.

    The external materials of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing dwelling.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure and [name]

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal scheme. The main issues in regard to which are the effects of the proposed development on a) the character and appearance of the area; and b) the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings with specific regard to privacy.

  3. Section 04

    Character and Appearance

    The appeal building is a two storey end terraced dwelling. It has a flat roofed ground floor extension abutting what appears to be a more historic two storey outrigger. There is a flat roofed box type dormer window in the rear of the original roof. There is a brick outbuilding in a small yard. Others in the terrace have also been altered at the rear in a number of ways. The wider area is a mix of architectural styles.

    The roof terrace would not be typical of the dwelling nor a manner in which others have been extended but it would nonetheless be viewed in a very much evolved and varied context. It would be a small, lightweight and largely unobtrusive permeable feature alongside the much larger box dormer. It would be a contextually very small component of the townscape overall. It would be to a rear elevation which can be viewed via what appears to be a shared private access but there would be a very limited public realm effect arising out of the addition.

    Consequently, the appeal scheme would not harm the character and appearance of the area. Such that it would comply with Policy BR 2 of the Broomhaugh and Riding Neighbourhood Plan 2023 (NP), [name] 9, QOP 1 and QOP 2 of the Northumberland Local Plan 2022 (NLP) and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). These all seek, amongst other things, for development to make a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.

  4. Section 05

    Living Conditions

    Whilst the roof terrace, by virtue of its elevation and projection, would allow views into the rear gardens of Number [address] and others, they would be interrupted by some dense foliage to the rear of neighbouring properties. There is already a degree of mutual overlooking between the dwellings themselves due to their tightly clustered siting. The windows in the dormer curve round to the side which gives a clear line of sight down into the rear garden of Number 2 specifically.

    Users of the appeal scheme would, by virtue of the siting of the roof terrace, likely use it to sit out with views directed to the picturesque setting of the valley beyond the settlement. Making it less likely they would choose to look sideways. With this and the above in mind, the proposals would not introduce any new overlooking such that the existing situation would materially change. As a result, they would comply with Policy BR 2 of the NP, [name] 1, QOP 2 and HOU 9 of the NLP and the Framework which all seek, amongst other things, for development to not cause unacceptable harm to the amenity of existing and future occupiers.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    Time limit and plans conditions are necessary to provide certainty for enforcement. A matching materials condition will ensure a suitable outward appearance. Given my above assessment, I do not deem privacy screens necessary.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    For the reasons given above, the appeal scheme would comply with the development plan. The appeal should therefore be allowed. J Reed APPEAL PLANNING OFFICER

  7. Section 08

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted, subject to the aforementioned conditions. [planning inspector] INSPECTOR

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    13 January 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    28 October 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3370108
Application reference
25/01066/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Northumberland County Council
Planning authority code
E06000057

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
29 July 2025
Valid date
31 July 2025
Start date
7 August 2025
Planning authority decision date
29 May 2025
Appeal decision date
13 January 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
82671
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21