Appeal 3370785
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as ‘[name] front porch and front extension/ internal alterations / roof lights.’
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for development described as ‘[name] front porch and front extension/ internal alterations / roof lights’ at [site address] , Hillingdon [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 64719/APP/2025/1230 subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14.
The external materials of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 03
Appeal Procedure
The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.
Section 04
[name] and Main Issue
The description above is taken from the application form and varies from the decision notice. This has not changed anything fundamental nor prejudiced the ability of any party to make their case in respect of the appeal scheme. The main issue in the determination of which is its effect on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 05
Reasons for the Recommendation
The appeal property is an end terraced dwelling within a residential area situated on a corner plot. The properties that form part of the terrace are constructed using the same materials giving them a sense of similarity however there is an eclectic mix of housing types within the area with no distinct uniformity. Houses are generally set back from the roadside with front gardens and porches of varying designs.
The proposal would introduce an extension to the front of the dwelling which would be visible from the surrounding area. The proposal would be of a larger width than the nearby porches however the height and depth of the extension would be the same as the porch of the adjoining dwelling which would ensure that it would not be visually intrusive. Combining its size with the use of matching materials and stepped in position, the proposal would be a recessive addition to the property and would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the area.
It would therefore comply with Policies BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 [name] 2021, [name] 11, [name] 12 and [name] 1 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020 that are concerned with development being well integrated into its surroundings amongst other things.
Section 06
Conditions
Other than the standard time limit condition, it is necessary to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans for certainty. In the interests of the character and appearance of the area, a condition relating to materials to match that of the existing dwelling is also necessary.
Section 07
Conclusion and Recommendation
For the reasons given above, the appeal scheme would comply with the development plan. I therefore recommend the appeal be allowed, subject to the conditions mentioned.
Section 08
Inspector’s Decision
I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, subject to the conditions stated.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 13 October 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 10 September 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3370785
- Application reference
- 64719/APP/2025/1230
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Planning authority code
- E09000017
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 8 August 2025
- Valid date
- 15 August 2025
- Start date
- 20 August 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 13 October 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 77883
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21