Appeal 3370945
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
detached double garage at the top of our gravelled parking area. Size - Height 2420mm to eaves - rising to 3480mm at top of apex roof; Width 5875mm; depth 5720mm. West elevation approx 21.5m from the front of the house; South elevation is approx 7.8m from neighbouring boundary ([name]); East elevation is approx 4.5m from [site address] (only public view); North elevation is against neighbouring boundary (Penradden). Construction - Shiplap sides and roller shutter door front (South facing). Apex metal roof. West side personnel door.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for detached double garage at the top of our gravelled parking area. Size - Height 2420mm to eaves - rising to 3480mm at top of apex roof; Width 5875mm; depth 5720mm. West elevation approx 21.5m from the front of the house; South elevation is approx 7.8m from neighbouring boundary ([name]); East elevation is approx 4.5m from [site address] (only public view); North elevation is against neighbouring boundary (Penradden). Construction - Shiplap sides and roller shutter door front (South facing). Apex metal roof, west side personnel door, at Gledhow, [site address] , Whimple, Devon [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 25/0996/FUL, subject to the following condition:
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawings: Location Plan; [postcode] Gledhow Site Plan; [postcode] [name]; [postcode] Gledhow Approximate Tree Locations; [postcode] [name].
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
The appeal proposal has been commenced, although I observed at my site visit that the structure has not been completed and lacks walls or doors. For the avoidance of doubt, I am considering the development proposed on the submitted plans.
I have taken the description of development from the application form which includes lengthy detail and narrative. However, as ‘From the North and East sides, the structure is predominately hidden from view by existing plants / bushes / trees and fence line. The structure will be visible when traveling northwards towards the Hand and Pen junction, however it is partially screened by existing plants, bushes, trees and fence and as it is set back from the roadside it is not imposing. The West view would be from our house and again is screened by existing planting and parked vehicles on our gravel. We have already begun the works because we thought we could do so on permitted development, however because of the size, have realised that we need permission. As soon as we realised this, we have stopped work. To date, we have laid a concrete slab as a base, erected a steelwork frame and covered the roof with sheeting. Please see photographs provided’ is not an act of development, I have removed this element.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal site is within a small cluster of dwellings, which features a mix of building forms including single and two storey dwellings, detached garages and commercial buildings. Due to the immediately surrounding countryside, hedging and mature planting, the area has a semi-rural verdant character. The host dwelling is set back from the highway, as are some neighbouring dwellings. However, this does not form a consistent building line, due to surrounding dwellings differing spatial relationship to the highway, some of which are located directly adjacent the highway.
Due to the proposal’s location to the front of the host dwelling, it is rather prominent despite being screened by mature planting. Nevertheless, although the materials do not reflect that of the host dwelling, due to the proliferation of pitch roofs and variation of design of buildings in the area, the simple pitch roof design would not appear incongruous. Moreover, the shiplap cladding would effectively soften the visual appearance of the proposal and would not be out of character in this semi-rural setting.
Furthermore, the scale of the proposal, when viewed in the context of adjacent dwellings, is such that it is visually subservient to the host dwelling and clearly read as a domestic garage. Moreover, given the location slightly back from the highway behind the boundary wall, as well as the prominence and visual massing of other buildings in the area located closer to the highway, it is not seen to dominate the street scene.
To conclude, the proposal does not harm the character and appearance of the area and would accord with Strategy 7 and Policy D1 of the East Devon Local Plan 2013-2031. These policies seek, amongst other matters, to ensure development respects the key characteristics of the area and integrates positively with its surroundings.
Section 06
Conditions
As the development has been commenced, a time limit condition is not required. However, a plans condition is required to provide certainty.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons given above the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 3150No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 15 October 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 29 September 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3370945
- Application reference
- 25/0996/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- East Devon District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000040
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 12 August 2025
- Valid date
- 12 August 2025
- Start date
- 13 August 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 11 July 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 15 October 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 78016
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21