Appeal 3373004
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as “erection of a part two storey side and part single storey front extension, single storey rear extension”.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for the “erection of a part two storey side and part single storey front extension, single storey rear extension” at [site address] , Hounslow [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2025/1657, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing numbers: NN-R00-PR-101, NN-R00-PR-102, NN-R00-PR-103, NN- R00-PR-104
Section 03
Appeal Procedure, [name] & Main Issue
The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal. The description on the application form differs to the decision notice. I am however satisfied that it still accurately describes the proposal so the main parties would not be prejudiced by me using it for the appeal scheme. I have omitted the reference to the resubmission, to avoid unnecessary detail.
The Council has not raised any concerns with the single storey rear element, and I have no reason to disagree. Resultantly, the recommendation will focus on the two-storey side and single storey front extension and its effect on the character and appearance of the area. This is the main issue in the appeal.
Section 04
Reasons for the Recommendation
The appeal building is a two-storey end terrace dwelling in a street of other similarly scaled and sited buildings. It appears to be relatively original. Its plot is wide and deep and somewhat tucked in the corner of what is a cul de sac. Whilst there is similarity in siting and type, many dwellings have been extended to the front and side in a number of different ways and sizes. The wider street scene is therefore a mix of design features and material detailing lending a variety to the area.
The proposed two storey side element would be large and prominent in terms of its scale and siting in comparison with the existing building. However, there is no clear articulation from the Council as to why this would be harmful given the variation in the surrounding context. It would be close to nearly the same width as the existing dwelling, but lower in ridge height and thus displaying some visual subservience. The scheme overall is designed to be deliberately modern and when combined with the rear section, the front extension would be read as more than one contrasting intervention in a set of bold geometric shapes. Owing to the lack of strong uniformity in the area and the setback corner location of the appeal building, I see this as being readily capable of being subsumed into the street scene acceptably.
The Hounslow Character, Sustainability and Design Codes Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 5A [name] focusses on the quality in the design of alterations thereto explaining, amongst other things, that two storey side extensions should be normally set back at least 1m from the original front house wall, as well as being subordinate and the symmetry should be kept or restored. Whilst there is some minor deviation from the guidelines, this small technical conflict would not result in overall conflict with the aims of the SPD.
The proposal would therefore be acceptable in terms of the character and appearance of the area and consequently comply with Policies CC1, CC2 and SC7 of the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan 2015-2030 and the SPD which, amongst other things, seek to ensure that development proposals are of a high-quality design and standard.
Section 05
Conditions
The time limit condition and reference to the approved plans are required for enforcement purposes. I have not included a matching materials condition as the plans detail them and have been secured by their own condition. The Council has not recommended any others, and I have not considered any more necessary.
Section 06
Conclusion and Recommendation
For the reasons given above, I recommend that the appeal should be allowed since it would comply with the development plan.
Section 07
Inspector’s Decision
I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted, subject to the conditions listed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 19 November 2025Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 28 October 2025 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3373004
- Application reference
- P/2025/1657
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Planning authority code
- E09000018
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 14 September 2025
- Valid date
- 14 September 2025
- Start date
- 18 September 2025
- Planning authority decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 19 November 2025
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 79991
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21